These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19345097)

  • 1. Audiovisual integration of speech in a bistable illusion.
    Munhall KG; ten Hove MW; Brammer M; Paré M
    Curr Biol; 2009 May; 19(9):735-9. PubMed ID: 19345097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Cross-Modal Phonetic Encoding.
    Shahin AJ; Backer KC; Rosenblum LD; Kerlin JR
    J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 38(7):1835-1849. PubMed ID: 29263241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Early and late beta-band power reflect audiovisual perception in the McGurk illusion.
    Roa Romero Y; Senkowski D; Keil J
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 113(7):2342-50. PubMed ID: 25568160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audiovisual speech perception: Moving beyond McGurk.
    Van Engen KJ; Dey A; Sommers MS; Peelle JE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Dec; 152(6):3216. PubMed ID: 36586857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neurophysiological Indices of Audiovisual Speech Processing Reveal a Hierarchy of Multisensory Integration Effects.
    O'Sullivan AE; Crosse MJ; Liberto GMD; de Cheveigné A; Lalor EC
    J Neurosci; 2021 Jun; 41(23):4991-5003. PubMed ID: 33824190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Audiovisual integration of speech falters under high attention demands.
    Alsius A; Navarra J; Campbell R; Soto-Faraco S
    Curr Biol; 2005 May; 15(9):839-43. PubMed ID: 15886102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Causal Inference Model Explains Perception of the McGurk Effect and Other Incongruent Audiovisual Speech.
    Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005229. PubMed ID: 28207734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptual uncertainty explains activation differences between audiovisual congruent speech and McGurk stimuli.
    Dong C; Noppeney U; Wang S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2024 Mar; 45(4):e26653. PubMed ID: 38488460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Primary and multisensory cortical activity is correlated with audiovisual percepts.
    Benoit MM; Raij T; Lin FH; Jääskeläinen IP; Stufflebeam S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Apr; 31(4):526-38. PubMed ID: 19780040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attention to touch weakens audiovisual speech integration.
    Alsius A; Navarra J; Soto-Faraco S
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Nov; 183(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 17899043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Motor Network Reduces Multisensory Illusory Perception.
    Murakami T; Abe M; Wiratman W; Fujiwara J; Okamoto M; Mizuochi-Endo T; Iwabuchi T; Makuuchi M; Yamashita A; Tiksnadi A; Chang FY; Kubo H; Matsuda N; Kobayashi S; Eifuku S; Ugawa Y
    J Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 38(45):9679-9688. PubMed ID: 30249803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eye Can Hear Clearly Now: Inverse Effectiveness in Natural Audiovisual Speech Processing Relies on Long-Term Crossmodal Temporal Integration.
    Crosse MJ; Di Liberto GM; Lalor EC
    J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(38):9888-95. PubMed ID: 27656026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Theta oscillations reflect conflict processing in the perception of the McGurk illusion.
    Morís Fernández L; Torralba M; Soto-Faraco S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 48(7):2630-2641. PubMed ID: 29250857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visually biased Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: A Study of the McGurk and Sound-Induced Flash Illusions.
    Butera IM; Stevenson RA; Gifford RH; Wallace MT
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165221076681. PubMed ID: 37377212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech-specific audiovisual integration modulates induced theta-band oscillations.
    Lindborg A; Baart M; Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J; Andersen TS
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219744. PubMed ID: 31310616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Top-down attention regulates the neural expression of audiovisual integration.
    Morís Fernández L; Visser M; Ventura-Campos N; Ávila C; Soto-Faraco S
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 119():272-85. PubMed ID: 26119022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multisensory perception and attention in school-age children.
    Barutchu A; Toohey S; Shivdasani MN; Fifer JM; Crewther SG; Grayden DB; Paolini AG
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Apr; 180():141-155. PubMed ID: 30655099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Musicians have enhanced audiovisual multisensory binding: experience-dependent effects in the double-flash illusion.
    Bidelman GM
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):3037-47. PubMed ID: 27334887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian binding and fusion models explain illusion and enhancement effects in audiovisual speech perception.
    Lindborg A; Andersen TS
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246986. PubMed ID: 33606815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reduced audiovisual integration in synesthesia--evidence from bimodal speech perception.
    Sinke C; Neufeld J; Zedler M; Emrich HM; Bleich S; Münte TF; Szycik GR
    J Neuropsychol; 2014 Mar; 8(1):94-106. PubMed ID: 23279836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.