BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19345612)

  • 1. Two discrete components of the 20 Hz steady-state response are distinguished through the modulation of activation level.
    Griskova I; Morup M; Parnas J; Ruksenas O; Arnfred SM
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 120(5):904-9. PubMed ID: 19345612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The amplitude and phase precision of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response depend on the level of arousal.
    Griskova I; Morup M; Parnas J; Ruksenas O; Arnfred SM
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 183(1):133-8. PubMed ID: 17828530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of the 40Hz steady state auditory evoked magnetic field from ages 5 to 52.
    Rojas DC; Maharajh K; Teale PD; Kleman MR; Benkers TL; Carlson JP; Reite ML
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Jan; 117(1):110-7. PubMed ID: 16316780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EEG differences between eyes-closed and eyes-open resting conditions.
    Barry RJ; Clarke AR; Johnstone SJ; Magee CA; Rushby JA
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 118(12):2765-73. PubMed ID: 17911042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A method to study global spatial patterns related to sensory perception in scalp EEG.
    Ruiz Y; Pockett S; Freeman WJ; Gonzalez E; Li G
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Aug; 191(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 20595034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of reduced attention on auditory amplitude-modulation following responses: a study with chirp-evoked potentials.
    Alegre M; Barbosa C; Valencia M; Pérez-Alcázar M; Iriarte J; Artieda J
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Feb; 25(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 18303559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Steady state responses to temporally congruent and incongruent auditory and vibrotactile amplitude modulated stimulation.
    Budd TW; Timora JR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):419-32. PubMed ID: 23769951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Caffeine effects on ERPs and performance in an auditory Go/NoGo task.
    Barry RJ; Johnstone SJ; Clarke AR; Rushby JA; Brown CR; McKenzie DN
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 118(12):2692-9. PubMed ID: 17905651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distributed auditory cortical representations are modified when non-musicians are trained at pitch discrimination with 40 Hz amplitude modulated tones.
    Bosnyak DJ; Eaton RA; Roberts LE
    Cereb Cortex; 2004 Oct; 14(10):1088-99. PubMed ID: 15115745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cortical oscillatory power changes during auditory oddball task revealed by spatially filtered magnetoencephalography.
    Ishii R; Canuet L; Herdman A; Gunji A; Iwase M; Takahashi H; Nakahachi T; Hirata M; Robinson SE; Pantev C; Takeda M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 120(3):497-504. PubMed ID: 19138878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chirp-evoked potentials in the awake and anesthetized rat. A procedure to assess changes in cortical oscillatory activity.
    Pérez-Alcázar M; Nicolás MJ; Valencia M; Alegre M; Iriarte J; Artieda J
    Exp Neurol; 2008 Mar; 210(1):144-53. PubMed ID: 18177639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory and spatial navigation imagery in Brain-Computer Interface using optimized wavelets.
    Cabrera AF; Dremstrup K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Sep; 174(1):135-46. PubMed ID: 18656500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Regularity increases middle latency evoked and late induced beta brain response following proprioceptive stimulation.
    Arnfred SM; Hansen LK; Parnas J; Mørup M
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1218():114-31. PubMed ID: 18514635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dissociation of psychophysical and EEG steady-state response measures of cross-modal temporal correspondence for amplitude modulated acoustic and vibrotactile stimulation.
    Timora JR; Budd TW
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):433-43. PubMed ID: 23770083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal electrode selection for multi-channel electroencephalogram based detection of auditory steady-state responses.
    Van Dun B; Wouters J; Moonen M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):254-68. PubMed ID: 19603882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-trial P300 estimation with a spatiotemporal filtering method.
    Li R; Keil A; Principe JC
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Mar; 177(2):488-96. PubMed ID: 19041343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Independent component analysis and clustering improve signal-to-noise ratio for statistical analysis of event-related potentials.
    Zeman PM; Till BC; Livingston NJ; Tanaka JW; Driessen PF
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 118(12):2591-604. PubMed ID: 17967560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Brain wave synchronization and entrainment to periodic acoustic stimuli.
    Will U; Berg E
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Aug; 424(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 17709189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disruption of immediate memory and brain processes: an auditory ERP protocol.
    Campbell T; Winkler I; Kujala T
    Brain Res Brain Res Protoc; 2005 Feb; 14(2):77-86. PubMed ID: 15721813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual biases for rhythm: The Mismatch Negativity latency indexes the privileged status of binary vs non-binary interval ratios.
    Pablos Martin X; Deltenre P; Hoonhorst I; Markessis E; Rossion B; Colin C
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 118(12):2709-15. PubMed ID: 17950031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.