217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19345807)
1. A novel platform for in vitro analysis of torque, forces, and three-dimensional file displacements during root canal preparations: application to ProTaper rotary files.
Diop A; Maurel N; Oiknine M; Patoor E; Machtou P
J Endod; 2009 Apr; 35(4):568-72. PubMed ID: 19345807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient.
Blum JY; Machtou P; Ruddle C; Micallef JP
J Endod; 2003 Sep; 29(9):567-75. PubMed ID: 14503829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of forces generated during root canal shaping and residual stresses of three nickel-titanium rotary files by using a three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
Kim HC; Cheung GS; Lee CJ; Kim BM; Park JK; Kang SI
J Endod; 2008 Jun; 34(6):743-7. PubMed ID: 18498904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of electropolishing on torque and force during simulated root canal preparation with ProTaper shaping files.
Boessler C; Paque F; Peters OA
J Endod; 2009 Jan; 35(1):102-6. PubMed ID: 19084135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative computational analysis of the mechanical behavior of two nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments.
Necchi S; Petrini L; Taschieri S; Migliavacca F
J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1380-4. PubMed ID: 20647101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of clinical use on the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
Ounsi HF; Salameh Z; Al-Shalan T; Ferrari M; Grandini S; Pashley DH; Tay FR
J Endod; 2007 Jun; 33(6):737-41. PubMed ID: 17509417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of torque required to fracture three different nickel-titanium rotary instruments around curves of the same angle but of different radius when bound at the tip.
Booth JR; Scheetz JP; Lemons JE; Eleazer PD
J Endod; 2003 Jan; 29(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 12540222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of phase transformation on the torsional and bending properties of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments.
Miyai K; Ebihara A; Hayashi Y; Doi H; Suda H; Yoneyama T
Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 16454792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The ability of different nickel-titanium rotary instruments to induce dentinal damage during canal preparation.
Bier CA; Shemesh H; Tanomaru-Filho M; Wesselink PR; Wu MK
J Endod; 2009 Feb; 35(2):236-8. PubMed ID: 19166781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of liquid and paste-type lubricants on torque values during simulated rotary root canal instrumentation.
Peters OA; Boessler C; Zehnder M
Int Endod J; 2005 Apr; 38(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 15810972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An in vitro comparison of torsional stress and cyclic fatigue resistance of ProFile GT and ProFile GT Series X rotary nickel-titanium files.
Kramkowski TR; Bahcall J
J Endod; 2009 Mar; 35(3):404-7. PubMed ID: 19249605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Torsional resistance of retreatment instruments.
Lopes HP; Elias CN; Vedovello GA; Bueno CE; Mangelli M; Siqueira JF
J Endod; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1442-5. PubMed ID: 21924199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Defects in nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. Part 1: Relationship between observed imperfections and factors leading to such defects in a cohort study.
Shen Y; Haapasalo M; Cheung GS; Peng B
J Endod; 2009 Jan; 35(1):129-32. PubMed ID: 19084142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus ProFile.
Berutti E; Chiandussi G; Gaviglio I; Ibba A
J Endod; 2003 Jan; 29(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 12540212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of forces developed during mechanical preparation of extracted teeth using RaCe rotary instruments and ProFiles.
da Silva FM; Kobayashi C; Suda H
Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 15606818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Defects in nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. Part 2: Fractographic analysis of fractured surface in a cohort study.
Shen Y; Cheung GS; Peng B; Haapasalo M
J Endod; 2009 Jan; 35(1):133-6. PubMed ID: 19084143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Separation incidence of protaper rotary instruments: a large cohort clinical evaluation.
Wolcott S; Wolcott J; Ishley D; Kennedy W; Johnson S; Minnich S; Meyers J
J Endod; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1139-41. PubMed ID: 17174668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cleaning efficiency of nickel-titanium GT and .04 rotary files when used in a torque-controlled rotary handpiece.
Suffridge CB; Hartwell GR; Walker TL
J Endod; 2003 May; 29(5):346-8. PubMed ID: 12775008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Defects in nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. Part 5: single use from endodontic specialty practices.
Shen Y; Coil JM; McLean AG; Hemerling DL; Haapasalo M
J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1363-7. PubMed ID: 19801231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of forces developed during mechanical preparation of extracted teeth using Profile NiTi rotary instruments.
Blum JY; Cohen A; Machtou P; Micallef JP
Int Endod J; 1999 Jan; 32(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 10356466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
