131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19345895)
1. Personal invitations for population-based breast cancer screening.
Saalasti-Koskinen U; Mäkelä M; Saarenmaa I; Autti-Rämö I
Acad Radiol; 2009 May; 16(5):546-50. PubMed ID: 19345895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Print information to inform decisions about mammography screening participation in 16 countries with population-based programs.
Zapka JG; Geller BM; Bulliard JL; Fracheboud J; Sancho-Garnier H; Ballard-Barbash R;
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):126-37. PubMed ID: 16962910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Are invitations to mammography screening a reasonable basis for informed consent?-- Secondary publication].
Jørgensen KJ; Gøtzsche PC
Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Apr; 168(17):1658-60. PubMed ID: 16674879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are benefits and harms in mammography screening given equal attention in scientific articles? A cross-sectional study.
Jørgensen KJ; Klahn A; Gøtzsche PC
BMC Med; 2007 May; 5():12. PubMed ID: 17537243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Decision aid for women considering breast cancer screening.
Pasternack I; Saalasti-Koskinen U; Mäkelä M
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2011 Oct; 27(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 22004777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An approach to enhance communication about screening mammography in primary care.
Nekhlyudov L; Braddock CH
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2009 Sep; 18(9):1403-12. PubMed ID: 19708801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic screening programmes in Europe: organization, coverage and participation.
Giordano L; von Karsa L; Tomatis M; Majek O; de Wolf C; Lancucki L; Hofvind S; Nyström L; Segnan N; Ponti A; ; Van Hal G; Martens P; Májek O; Danes J; von Euler-Chelpin M; Aasmaa A; Anttila A; Becker N; Péntek Z; Budai A; Mádai S; Fitzpatrick P; Mooney T; Zappa M; Ventura L; Scharpantgen A; Hofvind S; Seroczynski P; Morais A; Rodrigues V; Bento MJ; Gomes de Carvalho J; Natal C; Prieto M; Sánchez-Contador Escudero C; Zubizarreta Alberti R; Fernández Llanes SB; Ascunce N; Ederra Sanza M; Sarriugarte Irigoien G; Salas Trejo D; Ibáñez Cabanell J; Wiege M; Ohlsson G; Törnberg S; Korzeniewska M; de Wolf C; Fracheboud J; Patnick J J; Lancucki L; Ducarroz S; Suonio E
J Med Screen; 2012; 19 Suppl 1():72-82. PubMed ID: 22972813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Compliance, conscious participation, and informed consent in tumor screening programs].
Segnan N; Armaroli P
Epidemiol Prev; 1999; 23(4):387-91. PubMed ID: 10730482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are women getting relevant information about mammography screening for an informed consent: a critical appraisal of information brochures used for screening invitation in Germany, Italy, Spain and France.
Gummersbach E; Piccoliori G; Zerbe CO; Altiner A; Othman C; Rose C; Abholz HH
Eur J Public Health; 2010 Aug; 20(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 19892852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Social support and cervical and breast cancer screening in Argentinean women from a rural population.
Gamarra CJ; Paz EP; Griep RH
Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 19386062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does educational level determine screening participation?
von Euler-Chelpin M; Olsen AH; Njor S; Jensen A; Vejborg I; Schwartz W; Lynge E
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2008 Jun; 17(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 18414200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How should we measure informed choice? The case of cancer screening.
Jepson RG; Hewison J; Thompson AG; Weller D
J Med Ethics; 2005 Apr; 31(4):192-6. PubMed ID: 15800356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What information do breast cancer screening programmes provide to Italian women?
Giordano L; Rowinski M; Gaudenzi G; Segnan N
Eur J Public Health; 2005 Feb; 15(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 15788806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The contribution of clinical breast examination to the accuracy of breast screening.
Chiarelli AM; Majpruz V; Brown P; Thériault M; Shumak R; Mai V
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(18):1236-43. PubMed ID: 19720967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cancer screening - pros, cons, choice, and the patient.
Trevena L
Aust Fam Physician; 2009 Apr; 38(4):188-92. PubMed ID: 19350066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening mammography: a cross-sectional study to compare characteristics of women aged 40 and older from the deep South who are current, overdue, and never screeners.
Lopez ED; Khoury AJ; Dailey AB; Hall AG; Chisholm LR
Womens Health Issues; 2009; 19(6):434-45. PubMed ID: 19879455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast cancer screening programme as setting for an adjunct research project: effect on programme attendance.
Gram IT; Lund E
J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 18416955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening for breast cancer with MRI: recent experience from the Australian Capital Territory.
Price J; Chen SW
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Feb; 53(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 19453531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of different communication and organizational strategies on mammography screening uptake in women aged 40-45 years.
Giordano L; Stefanini V; Senore C; Frigerio A; Castagno R; Marra V; Dalmasso M; del Turco MR; Paci E; Segnan N
Eur J Public Health; 2012 Jun; 22(3):413-8. PubMed ID: 21746751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recall of and reactions to a surgeon referral letter for BRCA genetic counseling among high-risk breast cancer patients.
Vadaparampil ST; Quinn GP; Miree CA; Brzosowicz J; Carter B; Laronga C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):1973-81. PubMed ID: 19408048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
