These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19345895)

  • 61. Did the use of open invitations in place of timed appointment invitations reduce the uptake of breast screening in the London region during the COVID-19 recovery?
    Hudson SM; Binysh K; Duffy SW
    J Med Screen; 2023 Jun; 30(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 36220103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Informed choice to undergo prenatal screening for thalassemia: a description of written information given to pregnant women in Europe and beyond.
    Van den Heuvel A; Hollywood A; Hogg J; Dormandy E; Chitty L; Kabra M; Ma R; Masturzo B; Marteau TM
    Prenat Diagn; 2008 Aug; 28(8):727-34. PubMed ID: 18655228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [Screening--what information should potential participants receive?].
    Dirksen A
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Jan; 164(2):145-7. PubMed ID: 11831073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Improving the uptake of breast screening: one initiative in east London.
    Falshaw ME; Fenton C; Parsons L; Robson J
    Public Health; 1996 Sep; 110(5):305-6. PubMed ID: 8885668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Breast cancer counts: numeracy in breast cancer information on the Web.
    Ahlers-Schmidt CR; Golbeck AL; Paschal AM; Zackula R; Taylor NT
    J Cancer Educ; 2006; 21(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 17020522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Research on public health interventions in poor countries.
    Srinivasan S
    Issues Med Ethics; 2001; 9(4):118-9. PubMed ID: 16334915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. [New guidelines for breast cancer focus on information and education. First comes the truth].
    Aumiller J
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2009 Jan; 151(1-2):12-4. PubMed ID: 19227631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. The National Patient Notification Exercise: How well did local breast screening services cope with the additional workload?
    Zelenyanszki C; McAvinchey R; Hudson S
    J Med Screen; 2021 Jun; 28(2):177-184. PubMed ID: 32700625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Design and respondent selection of a population-based study on associations between breast cancer screening, lifestyle and quality of life.
    Sarkeala T; Heinävaara S; Fredman J; Männistö S; Luoto R; Jäntti M; Malila N
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Dec; 15():1256. PubMed ID: 26684747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Overdiagnosis and breast cancer screening.
    Day NE
    Breast Cancer Res; 2005; 7(5):228-9. PubMed ID: 16168144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Four years experience of the survey on quality control of lung cancer screening system in Japan.
    Sagawa M; Endo C; Sato M; Saito Y; Sobue T; Usuda K; Aikawa H; Fujimura S; Sakuma T
    Lung Cancer; 2009 Feb; 63(2):291-4. PubMed ID: 18579255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. 'Breast awareness' and 'breast self-examination' are not the same. What do these terms mean? Why are they confused? What can we do?
    Thornton H; Pillarisetti RR
    Eur J Cancer; 2008 Oct; 44(15):2118-21. PubMed ID: 18805689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Extending the age range for breast screening in England: pilot study to assess the feasibility and acceptability of randomization.
    Moser K; Sellars S; Wheaton M; Cooke J; Duncan A; Maxwell A; Michell M; Wilson M; Beral V; Peto R; Richards M; Patnick J
    J Med Screen; 2011; 18(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 21852703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. [Medical risk assessment--using the example of cancer screening].
    Gigerenzer G; Wegwarth O
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2008; 102(9):513-9; discussion 606-8. PubMed ID: 19213442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Acceptors and rejectors of an invitation to undergo breast screening compared with those who referred themselves.
    Hobbs P; Smith A; George WD; Sellwood RA
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1980 Mar; 34(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7365391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Expert group advises separating risk and benefit information from cancer screening invitations.
    Mayor S
    BMJ; 2012 Aug; 345():e5322. PubMed ID: 22867917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Are women with breast cancer receiving sufficient education and information about their treatment?
    Wengström Y
    Nat Clin Pract Oncol; 2008 Feb; 5(2):62-3. PubMed ID: 18073721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Breast cancer screening program in Canada: successes and challenges.
    Mai V; Sullivan T; Chiarelli AM
    Salud Publica Mex; 2009; 51 Suppl 2():s228-35. PubMed ID: 19967278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. [Mobile unit equipped for mass diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Kijima T
    Kango Kyoshitsu; 1973 Jan; 17(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 4487426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. EUROPA DONNA European breast cancer advocacy predictions: Milan breast cancer observatory.
    Kyriakides S
    Breast; 2005 Oct; 14(5):338-9. PubMed ID: 16185872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.