These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
589 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19345987)
21. A comparison of urinary complications following total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy to open abdominal surgery. Uccella S; Laterza R; Ciravolo G; Volpi E; Franchi M; Zefiro F; Donadello N; Ghezzi F Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1 Suppl 1):S147-9. PubMed ID: 17720232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy: our early experience. Vasilescu C; Sgarbură O; Tudor S; Popa M; Turcanu A; Florescu A; Herlea V; Anghel R Chirurgia (Bucur); 2009; 104(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 19886045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Li G; Yan X; Shang H; Wang G; Chen L; Han Y Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Apr; 105(1):176-80. PubMed ID: 17197013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Vaginal robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (VRARH) after laparoscopic staging: feasibility and operative results. Oleszczuk A; Köhler C; Paulick J; Schneider A; Lanowska M Int J Med Robot; 2009 Mar; 5(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 19153971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: comparison with total laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy; one surgeon's experience at the Norwegian Radium Hospital. Sert MB; Abeler V Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Jun; 121(3):600-4. PubMed ID: 21353294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study. Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with Ib1 stage cervical cancer: analysis of surgical and oncological outcome. Pellegrino A; Vizza E; Fruscio R; Villa A; Corrado G; Villa M; Dell'Anna T; Vitobello D Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 35(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 18760562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer. Gil-Moreno A; Puig O; Pérez-Benavente MA; Díaz B; Vergés R; De la Torre J; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15904613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional surgery in women with endometrial cancer. Kuoppala T; Tomás E; Heinonen PK Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2004 Jul; 270(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 12728326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients. Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D; Li J; Yuan J; Liang Z Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using harmonic shears. Nezhat F; Mahdavi A; Nagarsheth NP J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 16431319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Boggess JF; Gehrig PA; Cantrell L; Shafer A; Ridgway M; Skinner EN; Fowler WC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 199(4):357.e1-7. PubMed ID: 18928973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. Ko EM; Muto MG; Berkowitz RS; Feltmate CM Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 18929400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Robotic radical hysterectomy in the management of gynecologic malignancies. Pareja R; Ramirez PT J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(6):673-6. PubMed ID: 18774759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Boggess JF; Gehrig PA; Cantrell L; Shafer A; Ridgway M; Skinner EN; Fowler WC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 199(4):360.e1-9. PubMed ID: 18928974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Robotic radical hysterectomy. A literature review. Smith AL; Pareja R; Ramirez PT Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Aug; 61(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 19745798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for the surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma. Wong CK; Wong YH; Lo LS; Tai CM; Ng TK J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Aug; 31(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 16018773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]