These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1934744)

  • 21. Comparison of various vacuum mixing systems and bone cements as regards reliability, porosity and bending strength.
    Mau H; Schelling K; Heisel C; Wang JS; Breusch SJ
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Apr; 75(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 15180231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Hydroxyapatite impregnated bone cement: in vitro and in vivo studies.
    Kwon SY; Kim YS; Woo YK; Kim SS; Park JB
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1997; 7(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 9262826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relative influence of composition and viscosity of acrylic bone cement on its apparent fracture toughness.
    Lewis G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10950202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biomechanical properties of bone cement with addition of cefuroxime antibiotic.
    Mohd Fuad D; Masbah O; Shahril Y; Jamari S; Norhamdan MY; Sahrim SH
    Med J Malaysia; 2006 Feb; 61 Suppl A():27-9. PubMed ID: 17042225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reinforcement of bone cement using zirconia fibers with and without acrylic coating.
    Kotha S; Li C; Schmid S; Mason J
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Mar; 88(4):898-906. PubMed ID: 18384160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of fibre reinforcement on the mechanical properties of brushite cement.
    Gorst NJ; Perrie Y; Gbureck U; Hutton AL; Hofmann MP; Grover LM; Barralet JE
    Acta Biomater; 2006 Jan; 2(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 16701863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Creep characteristics of hand- and vacuum-mixed acrylic bone cement at elevated stress levels.
    Norman TL; Kish V; Blaha JD; Gruen TA; Hustosky K
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Apr; 29(4):495-501. PubMed ID: 7622534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative fatigue behavior of different bone cements.
    Gates EI; Carter DR; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1984 Oct; (189):294-9. PubMed ID: 6478701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Iron oxide nanoparticles significantly enhances the injectability of apatitic bone cement for vertebroplasty.
    Vlad MD; del Valle LJ; Barracó M; Torres R; López J; Fernández E
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(21):2290-8. PubMed ID: 18827693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Porosity of various preparations of acrylic bone cements.
    Jasty M; Davies JP; O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Harrigan TP; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Oct; (259):122-9. PubMed ID: 2208846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Augmentation of acrylic bone cement with multiwall carbon nanotubes.
    Marrs B; Andrews R; Rantell T; Pienkowski D
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 May; 77(2):269-76. PubMed ID: 16392130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Innovations in acrylic bone cement and application equipment.
    Kindt-Larsen T; Smith DB; Jensen JS
    J Appl Biomater; 1995; 6(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 7703541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mixing does not improve mechanical properties of all bone cements. Manual and centrifugation-vacuum mixing compared for 10 cement brands.
    Hansen D; Jensen JS
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1992 Feb; 63(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 1738962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Compressive strength and surface characterization of glass ionomer cements modified by particles of bioactive glass.
    Yli-Urpo H; Lassila LV; Närhi T; Vallittu PK
    Dent Mater; 2005 Mar; 21(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 15705426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mechanical properties of an improved visible light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Yap AU; Mudambi S; Chew CL; Neo JC
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 11357573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of the mechanical properties of Simplex, Zimmer, and Zimmer low viscosity bone cements.
    Weber SC; Bargar WL
    Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs; 1983; 11(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 6615994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Physicochemical, mechanical, and biological properties of bone cements prepared with functionalized methacrylates.
    Sabino MA; Ajami D; Salih V; Nazhat SN; Vargas-Coronado R; Cauich-Rodríguez JV; Ginebra MP
    J Biomater Appl; 2004 Oct; 19(2):147-61. PubMed ID: 15381787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The mechanical properties of "cement-antibiotic" mixtures.
    De Palma L; Greco F; Ciarpaglini C; Caneva C
    Ital J Orthop Traumatol; 1982 Dec; 8(4):461-7. PubMed ID: 7183664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mechanical properties of vacuum-mixed acrylic bone cement.
    Lewis G; Austin GE
    J Appl Biomater; 1994; 5(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 8580537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bone-particle-impregnated bone cement: an in vitro study.
    Liu YK; Park JB; Njus GO; Stienstra D
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Feb; 21(2):247-61. PubMed ID: 3818684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.