633 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19348051)
21. Getting ready for MDS 3.0: patient evaluation takes a new turn.
Martin CM
Consult Pharm; 2010 Jul; 25(7):404-6, 411-5. PubMed ID: 20601346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Maintaining standards for pressure ulcer management in care homes.
O'Hare J
Nurs Stand; 2008 Jul 16-22; 22(45):62-4, 66, 68. PubMed ID: 18686696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. New conditions for coverage will impose a host of new requirements on dialysis clinics.
Riley J; Pristave R; Kannensohn KJ
Nephrol News Issues; 2005 Apr; 19(5):25-6, 28, 30. PubMed ID: 15861764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. A new look at incontinence.
Klusch L
Provider; 2010 Jun; 36(6):47, 49, 51 passim. PubMed ID: 20590047
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Regulatory components for treating persistent pain in long-term care.
Planton J; Edlund BJ
J Gerontol Nurs; 2010 Apr; 36(4):49-56. PubMed ID: 20180499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Survey, certification and enforcement procedures for nursing facilities.
Rife J; Chittick R; Freeman T
J Long Term Care Adm; 1996; 24(3):36-40. PubMed ID: 10164257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Questionable quality initiative. Nursing homes frustrated with CMS measures.
Duff S
Mod Healthc; 2002 May; 32(20):20-1. PubMed ID: 12048836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Level 1: basic assessment and management of urinary incontinence in nursing homes.
Palmer MH
Nurse Pract Forum; 1994 Sep; 5(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 7950494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Preparing for surveys.
Johnson L
Balance; 1998 Dec; 2(8):6-8. PubMed ID: 10345249
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. CMS issues much-anticipated EMTALA guidelines.
Brown LC; Cochran RG
J Trauma Nurs; 2004; 11(3):107-10. PubMed ID: 16512270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Rewriting the book on quality.
Gold MF
Provider; 1999 Jul; 25(7):suppl 2-4. PubMed ID: 10539079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Focus on: urinary incontinence: Reducing risk and improving quality of care can be done simultaneously as providers face renewed scrutiny.
Klusch L
Provider; 2011 Jun; 37(6):37, 39, 41 passim. PubMed ID: 21815351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Challenge to change: CMS interpretive guidance--urinary incontinence and indwelling catheters.
Newman DK
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Dec; 51(12):6, 8. PubMed ID: 16509028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Urinary catheterization in the elderly patient].
Pader ML; Rolland Y; Castex A; Nourhashemi F; Vellas B; Oustric S; Soulié M
Soins Gerontol; 2008; (72):11-4. PubMed ID: 18727569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. HCFA's new survey protocols: the honeymoon may soon be over.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1999 Jul; 7(15):3-5. PubMed ID: 10558111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. HCFA to allow imposition of CMPs (civil monetary penalties) up to $10,000 for single violations.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1999 Apr; 7(7):1, 4-5. PubMed ID: 10351614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. OASIS is here--serious issues arise.
Humphrey CJ
Home Healthc Nurse; 1999 Apr; 17(4):209-10. PubMed ID: 10382432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. National report calls for more teeth in implementing enforcement remedies.
Weiss HP
Balance; 1999; 3(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 10346527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. SIGN guidelines on managing urinary incontinence.
Morrow L
Nurs Times; 2005 May 3-9; 101(18):53-4. PubMed ID: 15892507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Collect these data to assess nursing quality.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2008 Jul; 33(7):92-4. PubMed ID: 19035032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
