633 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19348051)
41. CMS clarification of survey and certification interpretive guidelines.
Sollins HL
Geriatr Nurs; 2008; 29(2):92-3. PubMed ID: 18394508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Don't be a D.R.I.P.
Tellis-Nayak M
Provider; 1998 Mar; 24(3):67, 69. PubMed ID: 10177193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. HCFA guidance to surveyors encourages immediate jeopardy citations, industry group warns.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 2000 Aug; 8(17):1, 3-5. PubMed ID: 11186783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Changes and dangers: managing survey risk within a PPS environment.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1999 Jul; 7(15):6-7. PubMed ID: 10558112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Guidance on urinary incontinence.
Newman DK
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2004 Dec; 50(12):8. PubMed ID: 15632450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Inside HCFA. Ever wish someone would survey the surveyors? These people do.
Sullivan JG
Contemp Longterm Care; 1996 Jul; 19(7):40-3, 45, 47. PubMed ID: 10158662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Should patients get EPO subcutaneously?
Wish JB
Nephrol News Issues; 2006 Aug; 20(9):12. PubMed ID: 16916054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Improve your compliance record in 2001.
LTC Regul Risk Liabil Advis; 2000 Dec; 8(26):1-3. PubMed ID: 11291140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Section F-314 through a long-term care surveyor's eyes.
Turnbull GB
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Sep; 51(9):16-7. PubMed ID: 16353386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. The minimum data set urinary incontinence quality indicators: do they reflect differences in care processes related to incontinence?
Schnelle JF; Cadogan MP; Yoshii J; Al-Samarrai NR; Osterweil D; Bates-Jensen BM; Simmons SF
Med Care; 2003 Aug; 41(8):909-22. PubMed ID: 12886171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. HCFA releases revised enforcement procedures, providers concerned about focus on punishment.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 2000 Jan; 8(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 10787997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Quality care is key to survey success.
Siclari PM
Provider; 1991 Jul; 17(7):14-6, 19-20, 23. PubMed ID: 10114252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. The interpretive guidelines: rote, reason or regulation?
Infante M
Contemp Longterm Care; 1991 Jul; 14(7):54, 78. PubMed ID: 10112233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Critics seek changes in nursing home survey.
Eubanks P
Hospitals; 1989 Feb; 63(3):68. PubMed ID: 2912864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Urinary incontinence and the risk for falls: is there a relationship?
Dornberger S
Director; 2007; 15(4):25-9. PubMed ID: 19343864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. How much is too much?
Humphrey CJ
Home Healthc Nurse; 1998 May; 16(5):279. PubMed ID: 9644376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. The federal monitoring process and LTC providers. An overview of the role of federal surveyors and their work with state agencies and long-term care facilities.
Kelso KM; Dymon HD
Contemp Longterm Care; 1989 Jun; 12(7):26, 92, 94. PubMed ID: 10304195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The new F-Tag 315.
Lekan-Rutledge D
J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2006 Nov; 7(9):607-10. PubMed ID: 17095429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. White Paper on the survey process.
American Medical Directors Association
J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2006 Feb; 7(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 16461255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Enforcement heats up as HCFA and Congress spar.
Fogg RJ
Contemp Longterm Care; 1998 Dec; 21(12):43. PubMed ID: 10346156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
