299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19348156)
1. Word length and lexical competition: longer is the same as shorter.
Vitevitch MS; Stamer MK; Sereno JA
Lang Speech; 2008; 51(Pt 4):361-83. PubMed ID: 19348156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The spread of the phonological neighborhood influences spoken word recognition.
Vitevitch MS
Mem Cognit; 2007 Jan; 35(1):166-75. PubMed ID: 17533890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative evaluation of lexical status, word frequency, and neighborhood density as context effects in spoken word recognition.
Benki JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1689-705. PubMed ID: 12656401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Examination of the neighborhood activation theory in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
Dirks DD; Takayanagi S; Moshfegh A; Noffsinger PD; Fausti SA
Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11271971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of the phonological neighborhood clustering coefficient on spoken word recognition.
Chan KY; Vitevitch MS
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1934-49. PubMed ID: 19968444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition of native and Spanish-accented words by native English and Spanish listeners.
Imai S; Walley AC; Flege JE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Feb; 117(2):896-907. PubMed ID: 15759709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lexical restructuring in the absence of literacy.
Venturaa P; Kolinsky R; Fernandesa S; Queridoa L; Morais J
Cognition; 2007 Nov; 105(2):334-61. PubMed ID: 17113063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Phonotactics, neighborhood activation, and lexical access for spoken words.
Vitevitch MS; Luce PA; Pisoni DB; Auer ET
Brain Lang; 1999 Jun 1-15; 68(1-2):306-11. PubMed ID: 10433774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.
Luce PA; Pisoni DB
Ear Hear; 1998 Feb; 19(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 9504270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early effects of neighborhood density and phonotactic probability of spoken words on event-related potentials.
Hunter CR
Brain Lang; 2013 Dec; 127(3):463-74. PubMed ID: 24129200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identifying nonwords: effects of lexical neighborhoods, phonotactic probability, and listener characteristics.
Janse E; Newman RS
Lang Speech; 2013 Dec; 56(Pt 4):421-41. PubMed ID: 24597272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lexical effects on spoken-word recognition in children with normal hearing.
Krull V; Choi S; Kirk KI; Prusick L; French B
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):102-14. PubMed ID: 19701087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of Persian Lexical Neighborhood Tests.
Oryadi-Zanjani MM; Zamani A
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Dec; 139():110406. PubMed ID: 33152584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of the lexicon on speech read word recognition: contrasting segmental and lexical distinctiveness.
Auer ET
Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):341-7. PubMed ID: 12120798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Observing neighborhood effects without neighbors.
Suárez L; Tan SH; Yap MJ; Goh WD
Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Jun; 18(3):605-11. PubMed ID: 21380585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The phonographic language network: Using network science to investigate the phonological and orthographic similarity structure of language.
Siew CSQ; Vitevitch MS
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Mar; 148(3):475-500. PubMed ID: 30802126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Similarity relations among spoken words: the special status of rimes in English.
De Cara B; Goswami U
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2002 Aug; 34(3):416-23. PubMed ID: 12395558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phonological neighbourhood effects in French spoken-word recognition.
Dufour S; Frauenfelder UH
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):226-38. PubMed ID: 19806483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of 2-hop network density on spoken word recognition.
Siew CS
Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):496-502. PubMed ID: 27383618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Early Speech Segmentation in French-learning Infants: Monosyllabic Words versus Embedded Syllables.
Nishibayashi LL; Goyet L; Nazzi T
Lang Speech; 2015 Sep; 58(Pt 3):334-50. PubMed ID: 26529900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
