These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19348550)

  • 1. Perceptions of randomness: why three heads are better than four.
    Hahn U; Warren PA
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Apr; 116(2):454-61. PubMed ID: 19348550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perception of randomness: On the time of streaks.
    Sun Y; Wang H
    Cogn Psychol; 2010 Dec; 61(4):333-42. PubMed ID: 20728080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of short-term memory capacity and task experience for overconfidence in judgment under uncertainty.
    Hansson P; Juslin P; Winman A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1027-42. PubMed ID: 18763889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Occurrence and nonoccurrence of random sequences: comment on Hahn and Warren (2009).
    Sun Y; Tweney RD; Wang H
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Apr; 117(2):697-705; discussion 706-11. PubMed ID: 20438245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Who "believes" in the Gambler's Fallacy and why?
    Farmer GD; Warren PA; Hahn U
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Jan; 146(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 28054813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What's next? Judging sequences of binary events.
    Oskarsson AT; Van Boven L; McClelland GH; Hastie R
    Psychol Bull; 2009 Mar; 135(2):262-85. PubMed ID: 19254080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of causality in judgment under uncertainty.
    Krynski TR; Tenenbaum JB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):430-50. PubMed ID: 17696692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intuitive confidence: choosing between intuitive and nonintuitive alternatives.
    Simmons JP; Nelson LD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Aug; 135(3):409-28. PubMed ID: 16846272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree.
    Kahneman D; Klein G
    Am Psychol; 2009 Sep; 64(6):515-26. PubMed ID: 19739881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment.
    Pronin E
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Jan; 11(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17129749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why are people bad at detecting randomness? A statistical argument.
    Williams JJ; Griffiths TL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1473-90. PubMed ID: 23607677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The probabilistic nature of preferential choice.
    Rieskamp J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1446-65. PubMed ID: 18980407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The smart potential behind probability matching.
    Gaissmaier W; Schooler LJ
    Cognition; 2008 Dec; 109(3):416-22. PubMed ID: 19019351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adult age differences in the realism of confidence judgments: overconfidence, format dependence, and cognitive predictors.
    Hansson P; Rönnlund M; Juslin P; Nilsson LG
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Sep; 23(3):531-44. PubMed ID: 18808243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jul; 121(3):463-80. PubMed ID: 25090427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic hypothesis generation and human judgment.
    Thomas RP; Dougherty MR; Sprenger AM; Harbison JI
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Jan; 115(1):155-85. PubMed ID: 18211189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency, probability, and prediction: easy solutions to cognitive illusions?
    Griffin D; Buehler R
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):48-78. PubMed ID: 10090798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The allure of equality: uniformity in probabilistic and statistical judgment.
    Falk R; Lann A
    Cogn Psychol; 2008 Dec; 57(4):293-334. PubMed ID: 18456250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The cognitive substrate of subjective probability.
    Nilsson H; Olsson H; Juslin P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):600-20. PubMed ID: 16060768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why people are reluctant to tempt fate.
    Risen JL; Gilovich T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Aug; 95(2):293-307. PubMed ID: 18665703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.