BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19348844)

  • 1. Eight CT lessons that we learned the hard way: an analysis of current patterns of radiological error and discrepancy with particular emphasis on CT.
    McCreadie G; Oliver TB
    Clin Radiol; 2009 May; 64(5):491-9; discussion 500-1. PubMed ID: 19348844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiological error--an early assessment of departmental radiology discrepancy meetings.
    Driscoll DO; Halpenny D; Guiney M
    Ir Med J; 2012 Jun; 105(6):172-4. PubMed ID: 22973653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic errors in patients dying in hospital: radiology's contribution.
    Heriot GS; McKelvie P; Pitman AG
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Apr; 53(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 19527365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiology errors: are we learning from our mistakes?
    Mankad K; Hoey ET; Jones JB; Tirukonda P; Smith JT
    Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct; 64(10):988-93. PubMed ID: 19748004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patterns of diagnostic error in trauma abdominal CT.
    West OC; Anderson J; Lee JS; Finnell CW; Raval BK
    Emerg Radiol; 2002 Oct; 9(4):195-200. PubMed ID: 15290562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Error in radiology: classification and lessons in 182 cases presented at a problem case conference.
    Renfrew DL; Franken EA; Berbaum KS; Weigelt FH; Abu-Yousef MM
    Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):145-50. PubMed ID: 1549661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Error in radiology.
    Fitzgerald R
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Dec; 56(12):938-46. PubMed ID: 11795921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Introduction of QUIP (quality information program) as a semi-automated quality assessment endeavor allowing retrospective review of errors in cross-sectional abdominal imaging.
    Kielar AZ; McInnes M; Quan M; O'Sullivan J
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Nov; 18(11):1358-64. PubMed ID: 21855370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Quality control of outpatient imaging examinations in North Rhine-Westphalia, Part II].
    Krug B; Boettge M; Reineke T; Coburger S; Zähringer M; Harnischmacher U; Lüngen M; Lauterbach KW; Lehmacher W; Lackner K
    Rofo; 2003 Mar; 175(3):346-60. PubMed ID: 12635011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patterns of misinterpretation of adnexal masses on CT and MR in an academic radiology department.
    Asch E; Levine D; Pedrosa I; Hecht JL; Kruskal J
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):969-80. PubMed ID: 19380241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Managing errors in radiology: a working model.
    Melvin C; Bodley R; Booth A; Meagher T; Record C; Savage P
    Clin Radiol; 2004 Sep; 59(9):841-5. PubMed ID: 15351251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Common patterns in 558 diagnostic radiology errors.
    Donald JJ; Barnard SA
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2012 Apr; 56(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 22498190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Errors of interpretation as elicited by a quality audit of an emergency radiology facility.
    Rhea JT; Potsaid MS; DeLuca SA
    Radiology; 1979 Aug; 132(2):277-80. PubMed ID: 461779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of specialist neuroradiology second opinion reporting: is there added value?
    Briggs GM; Flynn PA; Worthington M; Rennie I; McKinstry CS
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Jul; 63(7):791-5. PubMed ID: 18555037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preliminary radiology resident interpretations versus final attending radiologist interpretations and the impact on patient care in a community hospital.
    Ruchman RB; Jaeger J; Wiggins EF; Seinfeld S; Thakral V; Bolla S; Wallach S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):523-6. PubMed ID: 17715095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outsourced teleradiology imaging services: an analysis of discordant interpretation in 124,870 cases.
    Wong WS; Roubal I; Jackson DB; Paik WN; Wong VK
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jun; 2(6):478-84. PubMed ID: 17411863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incidental PET/CT findings in the cancer patient: how should they be managed?
    Beatty JS; Williams HT; Aldridge BA; Hughes MP; Vasudeva VS; Gucwa AL; David GS; Lind DS; Kruse EJ; McLoughlin JM
    Surgery; 2009 Aug; 146(2):274-81. PubMed ID: 19628085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trainee reporting of computed tomography examinations: do they make mistakes and does it matter?
    Hillier JC; Tattersall DJ; Gleeson FV
    Clin Radiol; 2004 Feb; 59(2):159-62; discussion 157-8. PubMed ID: 14746785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. JOURNAL CLUB: Radiology Report Addenda: A Self-Report Approach to Error Identification, Quantification, and Classification.
    Brigham LR; Mansouri M; Abujudeh HH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1230-9. PubMed ID: 26587930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preauthorization of CT and MRI examinations: assessment of a managed care preauthorization program based on the ACR Appropriateness Criteria and the Royal College of Radiology guidelines.
    Blachar A; Tal S; Mandel A; Novikov I; Polliack G; Sosna J; Freedman Y; Copel L; Shemer J
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Nov; 3(11):851-9. PubMed ID: 17412184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.