These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19348965)

  • 1. Effect of imbalance and intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes when the available number of clusters is fixed in advance.
    Ahn C; Hu F; Skinner CS; Ahn D
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Jul; 30(4):317-20. PubMed ID: 19348965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A note on sample size calculations for cluster randomised crossover trials with a fixed number of clusters.
    Kelly TL; Pratt N
    Stat Med; 2019 Aug; 38(18):3342-3345. PubMed ID: 31069820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Imbalance and Intracluster Correlation Coefficient in Cluster Randomized Trials with Binary Outcomes.
    Ahn C; Hu F; Skinner CS
    Comput Stat Data Anal; 2009 Jan; 53(3):596-602. PubMed ID: 20084091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Power and sample size calculations for cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes when intracluster correlation coefficients vary by treatment arm.
    Kennedy-Shaffer L; Hughes MD
    Clin Trials; 2022 Feb; 19(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 34879711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Taljaard M; Donner A; Klar N
    Biom J; 2008 Jun; 50(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 18537126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sample size calculations for cluster randomised controlled trials with a fixed number of clusters.
    Hemming K; Girling AJ; Sitch AJ; Marsh J; Lilford RJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Jun; 11():102. PubMed ID: 21718530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The optimal design of stepped wedge trials with equal allocation to sequences and a comparison to other trial designs.
    Thompson JA; Fielding K; Hargreaves J; Copas A
    Clin Trials; 2017 Dec; 14(6):639-647. PubMed ID: 28797179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in community-based cluster randomization trials with a binary outcome.
    Braschel MC; Svec I; Darlington GA; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 26415500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How large are the consequences of covariate imbalance in cluster randomized trials: a simulation study with a continuous outcome and a binary covariate at the cluster level.
    Moerbeek M; van Schie S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():79. PubMed ID: 27401771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size calculations for 3-level cluster randomized trials.
    Teerenstra S; Moerbeek M; van Achterberg T; Pelzer BJ; Borm GF
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):486-95. PubMed ID: 18827041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A flexible sample size solution for longitudinal and crossover cluster randomized trials with continuous outcomes.
    Wang J; Cao J; Zhang S; Ahn C
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2021 Oct; 109():106543. PubMed ID: 34450326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Power calculation of adjusted McNemar's test based on clustered data of varying cluster size.
    Wu Y
    Biom J; 2018 Nov; 60(6):1190-1200. PubMed ID: 30288765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measures of between-cluster variability in cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Thomson A; Hayes R; Cousens S
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(12):1739-51. PubMed ID: 19378266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
    Westgate PM
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Planning a cluster randomized trial with unequal cluster sizes: practical issues involving continuous outcomes.
    Guittet L; Ravaud P; Giraudeau B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Apr; 6():17. PubMed ID: 16611355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimum number of clusters and comparison of analysis methods for cross sectional stepped wedge cluster randomised trials with binary outcomes: A simulation study.
    Barker D; D'Este C; Campbell MJ; McElduff P
    Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):119. PubMed ID: 28279222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.
    Martin JT; Hemming K; Girling A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):123. PubMed ID: 31200640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sample size considerations for stratified cluster randomization design with binary outcomes and varying cluster size.
    Xu X; Zhu H; Ahn C
    Stat Med; 2019 Aug; 38(18):3395-3404. PubMed ID: 31033011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intracluster correlation adjustments to maintain power in cluster trials for binary outcomes.
    Chakraborty H; Moore J; Hartwell TD
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Sep; 30(5):473-80. PubMed ID: 19386285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of the bootstrap in analysing cost data from cluster randomised trials: some simulation results.
    Flynn TN; Peters TJ
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Nov; 4(1):33. PubMed ID: 15550169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.