These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19348977)

  • 1. Choice of data extraction tools for systematic reviews depends on resources and review complexity.
    Elamin MB; Flynn DN; Bassler D; Briel M; Alonso-Coello P; Karanicolas PJ; Guyatt GH; Malaga G; Furukawa TA; Kunz R; Schünemann H; Murad MH; Barbui C; Cipriani A; Montori VM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 May; 62(5):506-10. PubMed ID: 19348977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.
    Ruano J; Gómez-García F; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Fernández-Rueda JL; Fernández-Chaichio J; Alcalde-Mellado P; Carmona-Fernandez PJ; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Viguera-Guerra I; Franco-García F; Cárdenas-Aranzana M; Romero JLH; Gonzalez-Padilla M; Isla-Tejera B; Garcia-Nieto AV
    Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 7(1):43. PubMed ID: 29523200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Machine learning computational tools to assist the performance of systematic reviews: A mapping review.
    Cierco Jimenez R; Lee T; Rosillo N; Cordova R; Cree IA; Gonzalez A; Indave Ruiz BI
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):322. PubMed ID: 36522637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High prevalence but low impact of data extraction and reporting errors were found in Cochrane systematic reviews.
    Jones AP; Remmington T; Williamson PR; Ashby D; Smyth RL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Jul; 58(7):741-2. PubMed ID: 15939227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic reviewers used various approaches to data extraction and expressed several research needs: a survey.
    Büchter RB; Rombey T; Mathes T; Khalil H; Lunny C; Pollock D; Puljak L; Tricco AC; Pieper D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jul; 159():214-224. PubMed ID: 37286149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Twister: A Tool for Reducing Screening Time in Systematic Literature Reviews.
    Kreiner K; Hayn D; Schreier G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2018; 255():5-9. PubMed ID: 30306896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
    Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. To IPD or not to IPD? Advantages and disadvantages of systematic reviews using individual patient data.
    Stewart LA; Tierney JF
    Eval Health Prof; 2002 Mar; 25(1):76-97. PubMed ID: 11868447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Quality appraisal of systematic reviews or meta-analysis on traditional Chinese medicine published in Chinese journals].
    Liu JP; Xia Y
    Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 27(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 17526167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Software tools for literature screening in systematic reviews in biomedical research.
    Van der Mierden S; Tsaioun K; Bleich A; Leenaars CHC
    ALTEX; 2019; 36(3):508-517. PubMed ID: 31113000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].
    Amato L; Colais P; Davoli M; Ferroni E; Fusco D; Minozzi S; Moirano F; Sciattella P; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Perucci CA
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. PubMed ID: 23851286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Web-based archive of systematic review data.
    Ip S; Hadar N; Keefe S; Parkin C; Iovin R; Balk EM; Lau J
    Syst Rev; 2012 Feb; 1():15. PubMed ID: 22588052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.
    Parker D; Mills S; Abbey J
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Jun; 6(2):137-72. PubMed ID: 21631819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modernizing the systematic review process to inform comparative effectiveness: tools and methods.
    Wallace BC; Dahabreh IJ; Schmid CH; Lau J; Trikalinos TA
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 May; 2(3):273-82. PubMed ID: 24236626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
    Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Involving the public in systematic reviews: a narrative review of organizational approaches and eight case examples.
    Boote J; Baird W; Sutton A
    J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Sep; 1(5):409-20. PubMed ID: 24236418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Innovations in data collection, management, and archiving for systematic reviews.
    Li T; Vedula SS; Hadar N; Parkin C; Lau J; Dickersin K
    Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(4):287-94. PubMed ID: 25686168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conducting systematic reviews of intervention questions III: Synthesizing data from intervention studies using meta-analysis.
    O'Connor AM; Sargeant JM; Wang C
    Zoonoses Public Health; 2014 Jun; 61 Suppl 1():52-63. PubMed ID: 24905996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.