These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19349478)

  • 1. Comment on: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified.
    Coory MD
    Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Jun; 39(3):932; author reply 933. PubMed ID: 19349478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The practice of systematic reviews. V. Heterogeneity between studies and subgroup analysis].
    Scholten RJ; Assendelft WJ; Kostense PJ; Bouter LM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Apr; 143(16):843-8. PubMed ID: 10347653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An overview of methods and empirical comparison of aggregate data and individual patient data results for investigating heterogeneity in meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes.
    Smith CT; Williamson PR; Marson AG
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2005 Oct; 11(5):468-78. PubMed ID: 16164588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of one-step and two-step meta-analysis models using individual patient data.
    Mathew T; Nordström K
    Biom J; 2010 Apr; 52(2):271-87. PubMed ID: 20349448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using individual patient data and aggregate data.
    Riley RD; Dodd SR; Craig JV; Thompson JR; Williamson PR
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(29):6111-36. PubMed ID: 18816508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Borrowing strength from external trials in a meta-analysis.
    Higgins JP; Whitehead A
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(24):2733-49. PubMed ID: 8981683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Issues in the meta-analysis of cluster randomized trials.
    Donner A; Klar N
    Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(19):2971-80. PubMed ID: 12325113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Random effects survival models gave a better understanding of heterogeneity in individual patient data meta-analyses.
    Michiels S; Baujat B; Mahé C; Sargent DJ; Pignon JP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 15718112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Application of Meta-regression and subgroup analyses of heterogeneity disposal in Meta-analysis].
    Shi XQ; Wang ZZ
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2008 May; 29(5):497-501. PubMed ID: 18956686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meta-analysis: different methods--different conclusions?
    Böckenhoff A; Hartung J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():39-43. PubMed ID: 11187581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Commentary: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified.
    Higgins JP
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 37(5):1158-60. PubMed ID: 18832388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Meta-analysis of clinical trials: uses and pitfalls].
    Boissel JP
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2007; 191(4-5):759-70. PubMed ID: 18225428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.
    Arends LR; Hamza TH; van Houwelingen JC; Heijenbrok-Kal MH; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):621-38. PubMed ID: 18591542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relative benefits of meta-analysis conducted with individual participant data versus aggregated data.
    Cooper H; Patall EA
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Jun; 14(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 19485627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?
    Huedo-Medina TB; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Botella J
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 16784338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analytic interval estimation for standardized and unstandardized mean differences.
    Bonett DG
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):225-38. PubMed ID: 19719359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantified superiority of cognitive behaviour therapy to antidepressant drugs: a challenge to an earlier meta-analysis.
    Parker GB; Crawford J; Hadzi-Pavlovic D
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2008 Aug; 118(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 18452571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imputing variance estimates do not alter the conclusions of a meta-analysis with continuous outcomes: a case study of changes in renal function after living kidney donation.
    Thiessen Philbrook H; Barrowman N; Garg AX
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 60(3):228-40. PubMed ID: 17292016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Viechtbauer W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):29-60. PubMed ID: 17535578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.