These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19350234)

  • 1. Comparative study of imaging at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T of the knee.
    Wong S; Steinbach L; Zhao J; Stehling C; Ma CB; Link TM
    Skeletal Radiol; 2009 Aug; 38(8):761-9. PubMed ID: 19350234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients.
    Bredella MA; Tirman PF; Peterfy CG; Zarlingo M; Feller JF; Bost FW; Belzer JP; Wischer TK; Genant HK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):1073-80. PubMed ID: 10587150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee joint.
    Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Davis KW; Shinki K; Kaplan LD; De Smet AA
    Radiology; 2009 Mar; 250(3):839-48. PubMed ID: 19164121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 3D-imaging of the knee with an optimized 3D-FSE-sequence and a 15-channel knee-coil.
    Notohamiprodjo M; Horng A; Kuschel B; Paul D; Li G; Raya JG; Reiser MF; Glaser C
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3441-9. PubMed ID: 22579529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of 3D vs. 2D fast spin echo imaging for evaluation of articular cartilage in the knee on a 3T system scientific research.
    Milewski MD; Smitaman E; Moukaddam H; Katz LD; Essig DA; Medvecky MJ; Haims AH
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1637-43. PubMed ID: 21683539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Knee joint: comprehensive assessment with 3D isotropic resolution fast spin-echo MR imaging--diagnostic performance compared with that of conventional MR imaging at 3.0 T.
    Kijowski R; Davis KW; Woods MA; Lindstrom MJ; De Smet AA; Gold GE; Busse RF
    Radiology; 2009 Aug; 252(2):486-95. PubMed ID: 19703886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cartilage MR imaging at 3.0 versus that at 1.5 T: preliminary results in a porcine model.
    Masi JN; Sell CA; Phan C; Han E; Newitt D; Steinbach L; Majumdar S; Link TM
    Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 15987970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnosis of internal derangement of the knee at 3.0-T MR imaging: 3D isotropic intermediate-weighted versus 2D sequences.
    Jung JY; Yoon YC; Kwon JW; Ahn JH; Choe BK
    Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):780-7. PubMed ID: 19789228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical value of routine use of thin-section 3D MRI using 3D FSE sequences with a variable flip angle technique for internal derangements of the knee joint at 3T.
    Kudo H; Inaoka T; Kitamura N; Nakatsuka T; Kasuya S; Kasai R; Tozawa M; Nakagawa K; Terada H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 31(8):1309-17. PubMed ID: 23684241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of cartilage-dedicated sequences at ultra-high-field MRI: comparison of imaging performance and diagnostic confidence between 3.0 and 7.0 T with respect to osteoarthritis-induced changes at the knee joint.
    Stahl R; Krug R; Kelley DA; Zuo J; Ma CB; Majumdar S; Link TM
    Skeletal Radiol; 2009 Aug; 38(8):771-83. PubMed ID: 19294379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differentiation between grade 3 and grade 4 articular cartilage defects of the knee: fat-suppressed proton density-weighted versus fat-suppressed three-dimensional gradient-echo MRI.
    Lee SY; Jee WH; Kim SK; Koh IJ; Kim JM
    Acta Radiol; 2010 May; 51(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 20350249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Synthetic-echo time postprocessing technique for generating images with variable T2-weighted contrast: diagnosis of meniscal and cartilage abnormalities of the knee.
    Andreisek G; White LM; Theodoropoulos JS; Naraghi A; Young N; Zhao CY; Mamisch TC; Sussman MS
    Radiology; 2010 Jan; 254(1):188-99. PubMed ID: 20032152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy.
    Disler DG; McCauley TR; Wirth CR; Fuchs MD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 7618561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3.0-T evaluation of knee cartilage by using three-dimensional IDEAL GRASS imaging: comparison with fast spin-echo imaging.
    Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Woods MA; Shinki K; De Smet AA; Reeder SB
    Radiology; 2010 Apr; 255(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 20173102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Articular cartilage grading of the knee: diagnostic performance of fat-suppressed 3D volume isotropic turbo spin-echo acquisition (VISTA) compared with 3D T1 high-resolution isovolumetric examination (THRIVE).
    Lee YH; Hahn S; Lim D; Suh JS
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):190-196. PubMed ID: 27207633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of cartilage surface injuries using 3D-double echo steady state (3D-DESS): effect of changing flip angle from 40° to 90°.
    Moriya S; Miki Y; Kanagaki M; Yamamoto A; Okudaira S; Nakamura S; Yokobayashi T; Ishikawa M
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec; 52(10):1138-42. PubMed ID: 22042983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 10-Min 3D Turbo Spin Echo MRI of the Knee in Children: Arthroscopy-Validated Accuracy for the Diagnosis of Internal Derangement.
    Fritz J; Ahlawat S; Fritz B; Thawait GK; Stern SE; Raithel E; Klyce W; Lee RJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 49(7):e139-e151. PubMed ID: 30142235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint: value of adding a T2 mapping sequence to a routine MR imaging protocol.
    Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Munoz Del Rio A; Baer GS; Graf BK
    Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):503-13. PubMed ID: 23297335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of patellar chondromalacia with MR: comparison between T2-weighted FSE SPIR and GE MTC.
    Macarini L; Perrone A; Murrone M; Marini S; Stefanelli M
    Radiol Med; 2004 Sep; 108(3):159-71. PubMed ID: 15343130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vastly undersampled isotropic projection steady-state free precession imaging of the knee: diagnostic performance compared with conventional MR.
    Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Klaers JL; Shinki K; De Smet AA; Block WF
    Radiology; 2009 Apr; 251(1):185-94. PubMed ID: 19221057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.