713 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19350506)
21. [Application of chromosomal karyotyping analysis and array CGH for fetal abnormalities detected by ultrasonography].
Wang Y; Tang B; Guo L; Chen H; Lu J; Yin A
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 34(4):550-553. PubMed ID: 28777857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prenatal detection and characterization of a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) derived from chromosome 22 with apparently normal phenotype.
Lin CC; Hsieh YY; Wang CH; Li YC; Hsieh LJ; Lee CC; Tsai CH; Tsai FJ
Prenat Diagn; 2006 Oct; 26(10):898-902. PubMed ID: 16915592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. High resolution comparative genomic hybridisation analysis reveals imbalances in dyschromosomal patients with normal or apparently balanced conventional karyotypes.
Kirchhoff M; Rose H; Maahr J; Gerdes T; Bugge M; Tommerup N; Tümer Z; Lespinasse J; Jensen PK; Wirth J; Lundsteen C
Eur J Hum Genet; 2000 Sep; 8(9):661-8. PubMed ID: 10980571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prenatal genomic profiling of abdominal wall defects through comparative genomic hybridization: perspectives for a new diagnostic tool.
Heinrich JK; Machado IN; Vivas L; Bianchi MO; Cursino Andrade K; Sbragia L; Barini R
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2007; 22(5):361-4. PubMed ID: 17556825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prenatal diagnosis of a 9q34.3 microdeletion by array-CGH in a fetus with an apparently balanced translocation.
Simovich MJ; Yatsenko SA; Kang SH; Cheung SW; Dudek ME; Pursley A; Ward PA; Patel A; Lupski JR
Prenat Diagn; 2007 Dec; 27(12):1112-7. PubMed ID: 17849500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Characterization of sSMC by FISH and molecular techniques.
Sheth F; Andrieux J; Ewers E; Kosyakova N; Weise A; Sheth H; Romana SP; LeLorc'h M; Delobel B; Theisen O; Liehr T; Nampoothiri S; Sheth J
Eur J Med Genet; 2011; 54(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 21316495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Molecular and cytogenetic study on 18 cases of amenorrhea: the use of fluorescence in situ hybridization and high resolution-comparative genomic hybridization].
Kong H; Ge YS; Wu Q; Wu HN; Zhou DX; Shen YY; Zheng YL; Cai MJ; Li J; Huang XL
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Jun; 24(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 17557232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. De novo 16p13.11 microdeletion identified by high-resolution array CGH in a fetus with increased nuchal translucency.
Law LW; Lau TK; Fung TY; Leung TY; Wang CC; Choy KW
BJOG; 2009 Jan; 116(2):339-43. PubMed ID: 19018765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The clinical application of interphase FISH in prenatal diagnosis.
Pergament E; Chen PX; Thangavelu M; Fiddler M
Prenat Diagn; 2000 Mar; 20(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 10719324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Wilkens L; Bredt M; Flemming P; Mengel M; Becker T; Klempnauer J; Kreipe H
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg; 2002; 9(3):304-11. PubMed ID: 12353141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Advances in molecular cytogenetics for the evaluation of mental retardation.
Xu J; Chen Z
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2003 Feb; 117C(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 12561054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prenatal diagnosis from cystic hygroma fluid: the value of fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Donnenfeld AE; Lockwood D; Lamb AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):1004-8. PubMed ID: 11641692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis: another experience.
Vialard F; Molina Gomes D; Leroy B; Quarello E; Escalona A; Le Sciellour C; Serazin V; Roume J; Ville Y; de Mazancourt P; Selva J
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2009; 25(2):277-84. PubMed ID: 19521095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Analysis of complex chromosomal aberrations in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes using multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization combined with whole chromosome painting].
Chen LJ; Li JY; Xiao B; Zhu Y; Liu Q; Pan JL; Qiu HR; Fan L; Zhang SJ; Lu RN; Xu W; Xue YQ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Dec; 24(6):635-9. PubMed ID: 18067073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cytogenetical diagnosis in paraffin-embedded fetoplacental tissue using comparative genomic hybridization.
Ozcan T; Burki N; Parkash V; Huang X; Pejovic T; Mahoney MJ; Ward DC
Prenat Diagn; 2000 Jan; 20(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 10701850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Strategies to identify supernumerary chromosomal markers in constitutional cytogenetics].
Douet-Guilbert N; Basinko A; Le Bris MJ; Herry A; Morel F; De Braekeleer M
Pathol Biol (Paris); 2008 Sep; 56(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 18456432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Spectral karyotyping of seven prenatally detected marker chromosomes and complex chromosome aberrations].
Song HL; Chen BJ; Fang Q; Xie YJ; Lin SB; Wu JZ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Aug; 29(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 22875493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparative genomic hybridization-assisted prenatal diagnosis of a de novo inverted duplication of chromosome 10q. A case report.
Chen CK; Chang SD; Chen YJ; Hsueh DW; Soong YK
J Reprod Med; 2003 May; 48(5):391-4. PubMed ID: 12815917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation for prenatal diagnosis: a cohort study of 3171 pregnancies.
Lee CN; Lin SY; Lin CH; Shih JC; Lin TH; Su YN
BJOG; 2012 Apr; 119(5):614-25. PubMed ID: 22313859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Identification of the origin of marker chromosome by comparative genomic hybridization].
Zhou L; Wu LQ; Liang DS; Pan Q; Long ZG; Dai HP; Li J; Cai F; Xia K; Xia JH
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2007 Apr; 32(2):264-7. PubMed ID: 17478934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
