369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19350835)
1. Modality effects in sentence recall.
Goolkasian P; Foos PW; Eaton M
J Gen Psychol; 2009 Apr; 136(2):205-23. PubMed ID: 19350835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phonological information in immediate and delayed sentence recall.
Rummer R; Engelkamp J
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Jan; 56(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 12587896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Phonological information in short-term memory of sentences].
Rummer R; Schrobildgen M
Z Exp Psychol; 2000; 47(2):144-54. PubMed ID: 10829617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption?
Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):243-8. PubMed ID: 18194067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The modality-match effect in recognition memory.
Mulligan NW; Osborn K
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):564-71. PubMed ID: 19271869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inverting the modality effect in serial recall.
Beaman CP
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):371-89. PubMed ID: 12047050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of elaboration and relational distinctiveness on sentence memory.
McDaniel MA; Dunay PK; Lyman BJ; Kerwin ML
Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(3):357-69. PubMed ID: 3177699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporal associations and prior-list intrusions in free recall.
Zaromb FM; Howard MW; Dolan ED; Sirotin YB; Tully M; Wingfield A; Kahana MJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):792-804. PubMed ID: 16822147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of recall procedures on the modality effect with numbers and enumerated stimuli.
Gibbons JA; Velkey AK; Partin KT
J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jan; 135(1):84-104. PubMed ID: 18318410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Word type effects in false recall: concrete, abstract, and emotion word critical lures.
Bauer LM; Olheiser EL; Altarriba J; Landi N
Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(4):469-81. PubMed ID: 20066926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Word associations are formed incidentally during sentential semantic integration.
Prior A; Bentin S
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 17367741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increases in intrusion errors and working memory deficit of poor comprehenders.
De Beni R; Palladino P; Pazzaglia F; Cornoldi C
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 May; 51(2):305-20. PubMed ID: 9621841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Semantic and phonological information in sentence recall: converging psycholinguistic and neuropsychological evidence.
Schweppe J; Rummer R; Bormann T; Martin RC
Cogn Neuropsychol; 2011 Dec; 28(8):521-45. PubMed ID: 22813068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigating the roles of phonological and semantic memory in sentence recall.
Alloway TP
Memory; 2007 Aug; 15(6):605-15. PubMed ID: 17654276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phonological working memory in German children with poor reading and spelling abilities.
Steinbrink C; Klatte M
Dyslexia; 2008 Nov; 14(4):271-90. PubMed ID: 17979186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repetition blindness: out of sight or out of mind?
Morris AL; Harris CL
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):913-22. PubMed ID: 15462629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Semantic relations and repetition of items enhance the free recall of words by multiple sclerosis patients.
Andrade VM; Oliveira MG; Miranda MC; Oliveira AS; Oliveira EM; Bueno OF
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Dec; 25(8):1070-8. PubMed ID: 14566581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall.
Farrell S; Lewandowsky S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):838-49. PubMed ID: 14516217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Individual differences in the representation of sentences in memory.
Merrill EC; Bilsky LH
Am J Ment Retard; 1990 Jul; 95(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 2386631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
