These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine. Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Superior-segment Bilateral Facet Violation in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation, Part III: A Biomechanical Study of Severe Violation. Xu Y; Le X; Zhang Q; Kuai S; Leng H; Duan F; Shi Z; Liu B; He D; Lang Z; Wu J; Wang L; Tian W Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 May; 45(9):E508-E514. PubMed ID: 31770344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical effect of 4-rod technique on lumbosacral fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric investigation. Wang T; Liu H; Zheng Z; Li Z; Wang J; Shrivastava SS; Yang H Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jul; 38(15):E925-9. PubMed ID: 23609200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A biomechanical comparison of different types of lumbopelvic fixation. Tis JE; Helgeson M; Lehman RA; Dmitriev AE Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(24):E866-72. PubMed ID: 19910754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion. Zhu Q; Itshayek E; Jones CF; Schwab T; Larson CR; Lenke LG; Cripton PA Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S599-611. PubMed ID: 22531900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical effect of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and axial interbody threaded rod on range of motion and S1 screw loading in a destabilized L5-S1 spondylolisthesis model. Fleischer GD; Hart D; Ferrara LA; Freeman AL; Avidano EE Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jan; 39(2):E82-8. PubMed ID: 24150429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model. Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical analysis of sacral screw strain and range of motion in long posterior spinal fixation constructs: effects of lumbosacral fixation strategies in reducing sacral screw strains. Fleischer GD; Kim YJ; Ferrara LA; Freeman AL; Boachie-Adjei O Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Feb; 37(3):E163-9. PubMed ID: 21857409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is pelvic fixation the only option to provide additional stability to the sacral anchorage in long lumbar instrumentation? A comparative biomechanical study of new techniques. Volkheimer D; Reichel H; Wilke HJ; Lattig F Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2017 Mar; 43():34-39. PubMed ID: 28199880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of lumbosacral fixation using Luque-Galveston and Colorado II sacropelvic fixation: advantage of using locked proximal fixation. Early S; Mahar A; Oka R; Newton P Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jun; 30(12):1396-401. PubMed ID: 15959368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical evaluation of a new pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization device (Awesome Rod System)--a finite element analysis. Chen CS; Huang CH; Shih SL BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Apr; 16():81. PubMed ID: 25880231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical analysis of a novel posterior construct in a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion model an in vitro study. Sethi A; Muzumdar AM; Ingalhalikar A; Vaidya R Spine J; 2011 Sep; 11(9):863-9. PubMed ID: 21802998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical comparison of iliac screws versus interbody femoral ring allograft on lumbosacral kinematics and sacral screw strain. Cunningham BW; Sefter JC; Hu N; Kim SW; Bridwell KH; McAfee PC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Mar; 35(6):E198-205. PubMed ID: 20195199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical testing of the lumbar facet interference screw. Kandziora F; Schleicher P; Scholz M; Pflugmacher R; Eindorf T; Haas NP; Pavlov PW Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jan; 30(2):E34-9. PubMed ID: 15644745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanics of dynamic rod segments for achieving transitional stiffness with lumbosacral fusion. Lazaro BC; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Yaqoobi AS; Brasiliense LB; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR Neurosurgery; 2013 Sep; 73(3):517-27. PubMed ID: 23756746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Segmental motion adjacent to an instrumented lumbar fusion: the effect of extension of fusion to the sacrum. Untch C; Liu Q; Hart R Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Nov; 29(21):2376-81. PubMed ID: 15507798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a lumbar intervertebral spacer with integrated screws as a stand-alone fixation device. Beaubien BP; Freeman AL; Turner JL; Castro CA; Armstrong WD; Waugh LG; Dryer RF J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Jul; 23(5):351-8. PubMed ID: 20084028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]