109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19353339)
1. Completeness of invasive cervical cancer at the Cancer Registry of Norway.
Bilet EF; Langseth H; Thoresen SØ; Bray F
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(7):1070-3. PubMed ID: 19353339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Completeness and accuracy of registration of ovarian cancer in the cancer registry of Norway.
Tingulstad S; Halvorsen T; Norstein J; Hagen B; Skjeldestad FE
Int J Cancer; 2002 Apr; 98(6):907-11. PubMed ID: 11948471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improvement in protection against adenocarcinoma of the cervix resulting from participation in cervical screening.
Mitchell H; Hocking J; Saville M
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):336-41. PubMed ID: 14681940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of registration of invasive cervical cancer.
Husted JA; Anderson TW; Gallagher R
Can Med Assoc J; 1983 Dec; 129(12):1275-7. PubMed ID: 6652593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pathology reporting of rectal cancer: a national audit.
Keating J; Lolohea S; Kenwright D
N Z Med J; 2003 Jul; 116(1178):U514. PubMed ID: 12897882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Mass screening for cervical cancer. A one-year registration of cervical cytological tests].
Bjørge T; Gunbjørud AB; Langmark F; Skare GB; Thoresen SO
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1994 Jan; 114(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 8191435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality control in cytopathology applied to screening for cervical carcinoma.
Marsan C
Pol J Pathol; 1995; 46(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 8713292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Cytological history of cases of invasive cervical cancer diagnosed in France in 2006].
Boulanger JC; Fauvet R; Urrutiaguer S; Drean Y; Sevestre H; Ganry O; Bergeron C; Gondry J
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Sep; 35(9):764-71. PubMed ID: 17765001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patterns of cervical cancer risk in Kentucky.
Hopenhayn C; Tucker T; Christian A; Christian WJ
J Ky Med Assoc; 2007 May; 105(5):205-8. PubMed ID: 17566462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Are analyses of cytological cervix smears from young women more harmful than beneficial?].
Skjeldestad FE; Hagen B; Hagmar B; Iversen OE; Juvkam KH; Steen R; Thoresen S; Hareide B
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(13):1782-5. PubMed ID: 17599128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Incidence and mortality of uterine cervix cancer in Norway. When do we get organized nation-wide cytologic screening in Norway?].
Magnus K; Langmark F
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1990 May; 110(12):1557-9. PubMed ID: 2187277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods Part II. Completeness.
Parkin DM; Bray F
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):756-64. PubMed ID: 19128954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after three consecutive negative Pap smears.
Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
J Med Screen; 2003; 10(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 14738657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Differences in cervical cancer mass screening results in Greater-Helsinki area].
Nieminen P; Tarkkanen J; Timonen T; Meyer B; Hakama M; Anttila A
Duodecim; 2000; 116(22):2489-96. PubMed ID: 12053343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Preliminary results from the pilot study on the National Cancer Patient Registry--Cervical Cancer.
Devi Beena CR; Tang TS; Gerard LC
Med J Malaysia; 2008 Sep; 63 Suppl C():63-5. PubMed ID: 19230250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Routine audit of large-scale cervical cancer screening programs.
Cuzick J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):605-6. PubMed ID: 18445817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Mass screening for cervical cancer. Experiences after 25 years of voluntary screening and 2 years of organized screening].
Thoresen SO; Skare GB; Sandvin O
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1997 Aug; 117(18):2613-5. PubMed ID: 9324815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical cancer study using the Cancer Registry.
Norman SA; Weinberg GB; Powell RK; Marconi KM
Pa Med; 1989 Dec; 92(12):42-6. PubMed ID: 2601967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [No effect of organized cervix cancer screening].
Zahl PH
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 May; 128(11):1302; author reply 1302. PubMed ID: 18511980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
