340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19353836)
1. Abandonment and reconciliation: addressing political and common law objections to fetal homicide laws.
Curran DS
Duke Law J; 2009 Mar; 58(6):1107-42. PubMed ID: 19353836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A woman's right to choose: wrongful death statutes and abortion rights--consistent at last.
Siano JR
Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):279-92. PubMed ID: 15871153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Prenatal tort law and the personhood of the unborn child: a separate legal existence.
Roden GJ
St Thomas Law Rev; 2003; 16(1):207-86. PubMed ID: 16211760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Do fetal rights limit mothers' rights?
State Legis; 2002 Jun; 28(6):6. PubMed ID: 12051253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The phoenix of abortional freedom: is a penumbral or Ninth-Amendment right about to arise from the nineteenth-century legislative ashes of a fourteenth-century common-law liberty?
Means CC
N Y Law Forum; 1971; 17(2):335-410. PubMed ID: 16602212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The history of abortion-related acts and current issues in Japan.
Miyazaki M
Med Law; 2007 Dec; 26(4):791-9. PubMed ID: 18284118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The born alive doctrine: a legal anachronism.
Westerfield L
South Univ Law Rev; 1976; 2(2):149-73. PubMed ID: 12083087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Inconsistencies in the legal status of an unborn child: recognition of a fetus as potential life.
Shah MK
Hofstra Law Rev; 2001; 29(3):931-69. PubMed ID: 16189918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion laws in the states.
Oliver L
NCSL Legisbrief; 2004 Oct; 12(38):1-2. PubMed ID: 15499709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Feticide is still legal in Louisiana.
Downing EF
Loyola Law Rev; 1980; 26(2):422-30. PubMed ID: 11660941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Constitutional considerations underlie Missouri's expansion of fetal rights within its wrongful death statute.
Brown ES
Miss Law Rev; 1996; 61(2):473-87. PubMed ID: 16086525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Religion, politics, and abortion.
Perry MJ
Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 2001; 79(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 16538743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Prenatal testing gone awry: the birth of a conflict of ethics and liability.
Ackmann EA
Indiana Health Law Rev; 2005; 2(1):199-224. PubMed ID: 17111503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The fetal homicide fallacy: a comparison of California's inconsistent statutes to other states.
Converse HA
Thomas Jefferson Law Rev; 2003; 25(2):451-68. PubMed ID: 15732183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Feticide in California: a proposed statutory scheme.
Nahra JP
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1979; 12(2):723-42. PubMed ID: 11664053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. What Lawrence v. Texas says about the history and future of reproductive rights.
Dailard C
Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):717-23. PubMed ID: 16700117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
McDonagh E
Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of state laws protecting abortion clinics and reproductive rights on crimes against abortion providers: deterrence, backlash, or neither?
Pridemore WA; Freilich JD
Law Hum Behav; 2007 Dec; 31(6):611-27. PubMed ID: 17268826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The legal status of embryos and implications for reproductive technologies and biotechnology research.
Bowens KK
J Biolaw Bus; 2006; 9(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 17111524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. "Conservative" views of abortion.
Devine PE
Adv Bioeth; 1997; 2():183-202. PubMed ID: 12348327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
