1027 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19357403)
41. Biomedical research: a culture in crisis?
Feldman EL
Nat Clin Pract Neurol; 2005 Dec; 1(2):61. PubMed ID: 16932493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Research squeeze.
Steele MW
Nature; 1994 Sep; 371(6494):194. PubMed ID: 8078576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Biomedical funding. A bumpy landing for cancer research.
Kaiser J
Science; 2004 Feb; 303(5660):936-7. PubMed ID: 14963292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Research funding. Research downturn.
Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5893):1144. PubMed ID: 18755947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Declines in NIH R01 research grant funding.
Mandel HG; Vesell ES
Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):189. PubMed ID: 18845728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Good news and bad news.
Garrison H; Bartholme N
Physiologist; 2006 Aug; 49(4):201, 203-5. PubMed ID: 16915995
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Research funding. Structural disequilibria in biomedical research.
Teitelbaum MS
Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5889):644-5. PubMed ID: 18669847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. U.S. budget. Amid the gloom, researchers prepare for a boom in funding.
Mervis J
Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5919):1274-5. PubMed ID: 19264988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Academic health centers.
Ebert RH; Brown SS
N Engl J Med; 1983 May; 308(20):1200-8. PubMed ID: 6341838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Biomedical research: facing the opposition.
Check E
Nature; 2006 May; 441(7089):17-9. PubMed ID: 16672943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Trends in research support and productivity in the changing environment of academic surgery.
Jackson HH; Jackson JD; Mulvihill SJ; Firpo MA; Glasgow RE
J Surg Res; 2004 Feb; 116(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 15013356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Is NIH filling the $ reality gap created by Medicare and Medicaid? But only for the biggest academic institutions?
Romano PE
Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2005; 20(4):196-7. PubMed ID: 16384527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Similarities and differences in philanthropic and federal support for medical research in the United States: an analysis of funding by nonprofits in 2006-2008.
Myers ER; Alciati MH; Ahlport KN; Sung NS
Acad Med; 2012 Nov; 87(11):1574-81. PubMed ID: 22914508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A plan for sustainable funding for US biomedical research.
Hensley P; LaMattina JL
Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2015 Feb; 14(2):147. PubMed ID: 25633798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Ethics. Senate inquiry on research conflicts shifts to grantees.
Kaiser J
Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5884):1708. PubMed ID: 18583586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. AM last page. The federal budget and academic medicine.
Moore DB
Acad Med; 2012 Jul; 87(7):990. PubMed ID: 22735566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Quantum grants: request for applications from the NIBIB.
Harrington DP
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):398-9. PubMed ID: 17412092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. The stimulus package and medical therapeutics.
Somberg JC
Am J Ther; 2009; 16(2):105. PubMed ID: 19262356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Health research feels the chill.
Culliton BJ
Nature; 1993 Nov; 366(6452):200-2. PubMed ID: 8232574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Responding to stimuli.
Mahapatra A
ACS Chem Biol; 2009 Apr; 4(4):233. PubMed ID: 19371128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
