BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

842 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19357612)

  • 1. Marginal adaptation of full-coverage CAD/CAM restorations: in vitro study using a non-destructive method.
    Romeo E; Iorio M; Storelli S; Camandona M; Abati S
    Minerva Stomatol; 2009 Mar; 58(3):61-72. PubMed ID: 19357612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
    Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 18798783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal accuracy of titanium copings fabricated by casting and CAD/CAM techniques.
    Witkowski S; Komine F; Gerds T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jul; 96(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 16872930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro comparison of vertical marginal gaps of CAD/CAM titanium and conventional cast restorations.
    Tan PL; Gratton DG; Diaz-Arnold AM; Holmes DC
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jul; 17(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 18355167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study.
    Vanoorbeek S; Vandamme K; Lijnen I; Naert I
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 20552087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings--a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations.
    Beuer F; Schweiger J; Eichberger M; Kappert HF; Gernet W; Edelhoff D
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 18620748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses.
    Att W; Komine F; Gerds T; Strub JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 19328277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of ceromer/fiber-reinforced composite crowns: effect of variations in preparation design.
    Cho L; Song H; Koak J; Heo S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):388-95. PubMed ID: 12447215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM.
    Tsitrou EA; Northeast SE; van Noort R
    J Dent; 2007 Jan; 35(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 16781043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal and internal fits of fixed dental prostheses zirconia retainers.
    Beuer F; Aggstaller H; Edelhoff D; Gernet W; Sorensen J
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 18620749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations.
    Bindl A; Mörmann WH
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Jun; 32(6):441-7. PubMed ID: 15899023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
    Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
    Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Oliver-Parra R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system.
    Tinschert J; Natt G; Mautsch W; Spiekermann H; Anusavice KJ
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):367-74. PubMed ID: 11504436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann M; Krafft T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 22475466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective observation of CAD/CAM titanium ceramic single crowns: a three-year follow up.
    Boeckler AF; Lee H; Stadler A; Setz JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Nov; 102(5):290-7. PubMed ID: 19853170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems.
    Kohorst P; Brinkmann H; Li J; Borchers L; Stiesch M
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 19583762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
    Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal adaptation of 1 fiber-reinforced composite and 2 all-ceramic inlay fixed partial denture systems.
    Monaco C; Krejci I; Bortolotto T; Perakis N; Ferrari M; Scotti R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):373-82. PubMed ID: 16900821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 43.