These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1935882)

  • 21. Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: a recipe to diminish the residual switch cost.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A; Demanet J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):342-56. PubMed ID: 17352616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accessing world knowledge: evidence from N400 and reaction time priming.
    Chwilla DJ; Kolk HH
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):589-606. PubMed ID: 16202570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Lost in the move? Secondary task performance impairs tactile change detection on the body.
    Gallace A; Zeeden S; Röder B; Spence C
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):215-29. PubMed ID: 19647451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. On the neural basis of focused and divided attention.
    Nebel K; Wiese H; Stude P; de Greiff A; Diener HC; Keidel M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):760-76. PubMed ID: 16337110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: are there "true" task switch effects?
    Arrington CM; Logan GD; Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):484-502. PubMed ID: 17470002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Thinking about the weather: How display salience and knowledge affect performance in a graphic inference task.
    Hegarty M; Canham MS; Fabrikant SI
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):37-53. PubMed ID: 20053043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Absence of perceptual processing during reconfiguration of task set.
    Oriet C; Jolcoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1036-49. PubMed ID: 14585021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Selective reaching: evidence for multiple frames of reference.
    Keulen RF; Adam JJ; Fischer MH; Kuipers H; Jolles J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):515-26. PubMed ID: 12075885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimating the quantitative relation between incongruent information and response time.
    Kerzel D; Weigelt M; Bosbach S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):267-79. PubMed ID: 16438922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Usability of liquid crystal displays for research in the temporal characteristics of perception and attention.
    Kihara K; Kawahara J; Takeda Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Nov; 42(4):1105-13. PubMed ID: 21139178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evidence for the selective attention mechanism and dual-task interference.
    Liu CC; Doong JL; Hsu CC; Huang WS; Jeng MC
    Appl Ergon; 2009 May; 40(3):341-7. PubMed ID: 19166992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The complex role of perceptual organization in visual display design theory.
    Sanderson PM; Haskell I; Flach JM
    Ergonomics; 1992 Oct; 35(10):1199-219. PubMed ID: 1516576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of uncertainty and diagnosticity on classification of multidimensional data with integral and separable displays of system status.
    Coury BG; Boulette MD; Smith RA
    Hum Factors; 1989 Oct; 31(5):551-69. PubMed ID: 2625349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dual displays.
    Tlauka M; Stanton D; McKenna FP
    Ergonomics; 2000 Jun; 43(6):764-70. PubMed ID: 10902886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Noise annoyance during the performance of different nonauditory tasks.
    Kjellberg A; Sköldström B
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Aug; 73(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 1945718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Configural displays can improve nutrition-related. decisions: an application of the proximity compatibility principle.
    Marino CJ; Mahan RR
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(1):121-30. PubMed ID: 15960091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does display configuration affect information sampling performance?
    Brand JL; Orenstein HB
    Ergonomics; 1998 Mar; 41(3):286-301. PubMed ID: 9520626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visual search and the detection of abnormal readings in graphical displays.
    Greaney J; MacRae AW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1997 Feb; 95(2):165-79. PubMed ID: 9062063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Proximity compatibility and information display: effects of color, space, and object display on information integration.
    Wickens CD; Andre AD
    Hum Factors; 1990 Feb; 32(1):61-77. PubMed ID: 2376408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Graphical displays: implications for divided attention, focused attention, and problem solving.
    Bennett KB; Flach JM
    Hum Factors; 1992 Oct; 34(5):513-33. PubMed ID: 1459564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.