These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19358860)
1. The conditioned satiating effect of orosensory stimuli. Davis JD; Smith GP Physiol Behav; 2009 Jun; 97(3-4):293-303. PubMed ID: 19358860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Orosensory stimulation is sufficient and postingestive negative feedback is not necessary for neuropeptide Y to increase sucrose intake. Torregrossa AM; Davis JD; Smith GP Physiol Behav; 2006 Apr; 87(4):773-80. PubMed ID: 16540131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The controls of fat intake. Greenberg D; Smith GP Psychosom Med; 1996; 58(6):559-69. PubMed ID: 8948004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. John Davis and the meanings of licking. Smith GP Appetite; 2001 Feb; 36(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 11161348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of palatability and learned satiety on energy density influences on breakfast intake in humans. Yeomans MR; Weinberg L; James S Physiol Behav; 2005 Nov; 86(4):487-99. PubMed ID: 16165170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sucrose sham feeding on a binge schedule releases accumbens dopamine repeatedly and eliminates the acetylcholine satiety response. Avena NM; Rada P; Moise N; Hoebel BG Neuroscience; 2006; 139(3):813-20. PubMed ID: 16460879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Post-ingestive positive controls of ingestive behavior. Sclafani A Appetite; 2001 Feb; 36(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 11161347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Texture and satiation: the role of oro-sensory exposure time. de Graaf C Physiol Behav; 2012 Nov; 107(4):496-501. PubMed ID: 22609070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Postpyloric stimuli are necessary for the normal control of meal size in real feeding and sham feeding rats. Davis JD; Smith GP; Miesner J Am J Physiol; 1993 Oct; 265(4 Pt 2):R888-95. PubMed ID: 8238462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sham feeding experience produces a conditioned increase of meal size. Van Vort W; Smith GP Appetite; 1987 Aug; 9(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 3662491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensory-specific satiety with simple foods in humans: no influence of BMI? Brondel L; Romer M; Van Wymelbeke V; Walla P; Jiang T; Deecke L; Rigaud D Int J Obes (Lond); 2007 Jun; 31(6):987-95. PubMed ID: 17160089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensory-specific satiety: comparison of taste and texture effects. Guinard JX; Brun P Appetite; 1998 Oct; 31(2):141-57. PubMed ID: 9792729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does modification of olfacto-gustatory stimulation diminish sensory-specific satiety in humans? Romer M; Lehrner J; Van Wymelbeke V; Jiang T; Deecke L; Brondel L Physiol Behav; 2006 Mar; 87(3):469-77. PubMed ID: 16458336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The control of water and sodium chloride intake by postingestional and orosensory stimulation in water-deprived rats. Davis JD; Smith GP; McCann DP Physiol Behav; 2002 Feb 1-15; 75(1-2):7-14. PubMed ID: 11890947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Persistence of sham feeding after intragastric meals in rats. Mook DG; Atkinson B; Johnston L; Wagner S Appetite; 1993 Jun; 20(3):167-79. PubMed ID: 8373140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Learning to sham feed: behavioral adjustments to loss of physiological postingestional stimuli. Davis JD; Smith GP Am J Physiol; 1990 Dec; 259(6 Pt 2):R1228-35. PubMed ID: 2260733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]