237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19359090)
1. Editorial comment on: Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: effect on operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and success rate.
Fornara P; Greco F
Eur Urol; 2009 Nov; 56(5):858. PubMed ID: 19359090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Editorial comment on: Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: effect on operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and success rate.
Novara G
Eur Urol; 2009 Nov; 56(5):857-8. PubMed ID: 19359085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: effect on operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and success rate.
Braga LH; Pace K; DeMaria J; Lorenzo AJ
Eur Urol; 2009 Nov; 56(5):848-57. PubMed ID: 19359084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.
Uberoi J; Disick GI; Munver R
BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1722-9. PubMed ID: 19519760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: review of the current literature, technique and outcome.
Singh I; Hemal AK
Can J Urol; 2010 Apr; 17(2):5099-108. PubMed ID: 20398449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is robotic surgery cost-effective: no.
Lotan Y
Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jan; 22(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 22080872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Weise ES; Winfield HN
J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17094760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Editorial comment. Comparison of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a single-center study.
Thomas R
Urology; 2011 Mar; 77(3):734; author reply 734-5. PubMed ID: 21377020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Perioperative comparison of robotic assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) pyeloplasty versus conventional LESS pyeloplasty.
Olweny EO; Park SK; Tan YK; Gurbuz C; Cadeddu JA; Best SL
Eur Urol; 2012 Feb; 61(2):410-4. PubMed ID: 22036645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcome analysis and cost comparison between externalized pyeloureteral and standard stents in 470 consecutive open pyeloplasties.
Braga LH; Lorenzo AJ; Farhat WA; Bägli DJ; Khoury AE; Pippi Salle JL
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1693-8; discussion1698-9. PubMed ID: 18708220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children.
Yee DS; Shanberg AM; Duel BP; Rodriguez E; Eichel L; Rajpoot D
Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):599-602. PubMed ID: 16504272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
Davenport K; Minervini A; Timoney AG; Keeley FX
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):973-7. PubMed ID: 16171940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Technical aspects of laparoscopic robot-assisted pyeloplasty].
Ferhi K; Rouprêt M; Rode J; Misraï V; Lebeau T; Richard F; Vaessen C
Prog Urol; 2009 Oct; 19(9):606-10. PubMed ID: 19800549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Population-based comparison of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in paediatric pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
Knoedler J; Han L; Granberg C; Kramer S; Chow G; Gettman M; Kimball B; Moriarty J; Kim S; Husmann D
BJU Int; 2013 Jun; 111(7):1141-7. PubMed ID: 23510261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty.
Patel V
Urology; 2005 Jul; 66(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15992879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term experience and outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children and young adults.
Minnillo BJ; Cruz JA; Sayao RH; Passerotti CC; Houck CS; Meier PM; Borer JG; Diamond DA; Retik AB; Nguyen HT
J Urol; 2011 Apr; 185(4):1455-60. PubMed ID: 21334663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Autorino R; Eden C; El-Ghoneimi A; Guazzoni G; Buffi N; Peters CA; Stein RJ; Gettman M
Eur Urol; 2014 Feb; 65(2):430-52. PubMed ID: 23856037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical management of congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a Pediatric Health Information System database study.
Vemulakonda VM; Cowan CA; Lendvay TS; Joyner BD; Grady RW
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1689-92; discussion 1692. PubMed ID: 18708209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic robotic-assisted management of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in patients with horseshoe kidneys: technique and 1-year follow-up.
Chammas M; Feuillu B; Coissard A; Hubert J
BJU Int; 2006 Mar; 97(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 16469030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?
Canon SJ; Jayanthi VR; Lowe GJ
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1791-5; discussion 1795. PubMed ID: 17707427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
