384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19359883)
41. How Medicare changes will affect your cardiovascular service line.
Lyle NA
Healthc Financ Manage; 2007 May; 61(5):86-94, 96. PubMed ID: 17514914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Medicare reimbursement and independent practice: the Utah example.
Peters S
Adv Nurse Pract; 1998 Nov; 6(11):14. PubMed ID: 9919055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Measuring and accounting for the intensity of nursing care: is it worthwhile?
Finkler SA
Policy Polit Nurs Pract; 2008 May; 9(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 18650415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Reimbursement options for WOC(ET) nurses in ambulatory care.
Regulatory/Reimbursement Task Force for WOCN
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2001 Jan; 28(1):24A-29A. PubMed ID: 11759620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Medicare confusion continues.
Morrisey PJ
Adv Nurse Pract; 1999 Jan; 7(1):12. PubMed ID: 10030165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Medicare reimbursement, nurse staffing, and patient outcomes.
Kaestner R; Guardado J
J Health Econ; 2008 Mar; 27(2):339-61. PubMed ID: 18207591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A tale of 2 illnesses.
Meyer CR
Minn Med; 2004 Feb; 87(2):16-9, 54. PubMed ID: 15005123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Casemix information, health care funding and nursing.
Ferguson L; McKinley S
Health Care Anal; 1994 Nov; 2(4):327-31; discussion 331-5. PubMed ID: 10139425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Clinical RN involvement in bedside-centered case management.
Bair NL; Griswold JT; Head JL
Nurs Econ; 1989; 7(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 2503728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Ensuring high-quality cancer care in the Medicare program.
Oncology Nursing Society
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2008 May; 35(3):335. PubMed ID: 18467282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Resource-based Relative Value Scale and reimbursement for anesthesiology services: time is of the essence.
Cullen DJ
Anesthesiology; 1990 Oct; 73(4):593-5. PubMed ID: 2121069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Experience with Medicare's new technology add-on payment program.
Clyde AT; Bockstedt L; Farkas JA; Jackson C
Health Aff (Millwood); 2008; 27(6):1632-41. PubMed ID: 18997222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Nursing intensity: In the footsteps of John Thompson.
Welton JM; Halloran EJ; Zone-Smith L
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 122():367-71. PubMed ID: 17102281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Medicare myths and realities.
Glaser DM
Adv Nurse Pract; 2001 Sep; 9(9):28-30. PubMed ID: 12420477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. The basics on bundled services.
Peters S
Adv Nurse Pract; 1999 May; 7(5):17. PubMed ID: 10578728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. New DRGs boost pay. But some say system isn't only reason.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2009 Jan; 39(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 19230085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. PE-RVU changes could cut major procedures by 10 percent.
Med Health; 2006 Sep; 60(35):7-8. PubMed ID: 17020114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. [Integration of nursing services. Making nursing visible in DRG].
Kleinknecht-Dolf M; Baumberger D; Zimmermann N; Staudacher D; Spirig R
Krankenpfl Soins Infirm; 2012; 105(4):20-1. PubMed ID: 22545509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Revision of the CPI hospital services component.
Cardenas EM
Mon Labor Rev; 1996 Dec; 119(12):40-8. PubMed ID: 10166726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Medicare outliers: a challenge for nurse managers.
Kerfoot KM
Nurs Econ; 1988; 6(5):272-3. PubMed ID: 3143921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
