These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19360477)

  • 61. Vibrotactile "on-thigh" alerting system in the cockpit.
    Salzer Y; Oron-Gilad T; Ronen A; Parmet Y
    Hum Factors; 2011 Apr; 53(2):118-31. PubMed ID: 21702330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Human-centered design for neonatal apnea monitoring: application of the UFuRT process to analyze a monitor display layout.
    Brannon TS
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2008 Nov; ():886. PubMed ID: 18999013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Cross-modal visual and vibrotactile tracking.
    van Erp JB; Verschoor MH
    Appl Ergon; 2004 Mar; 35(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 15105071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Effects of touch target location on performance and physical demands of computer touchscreen use.
    Kang H; Shin G
    Appl Ergon; 2017 May; 61():159-167. PubMed ID: 28237014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Effect of Electrostatic Tactile Feedback on Accuracy and Efficiency of Pan Gestures on Touch Screens.
    Liu G; Sun X; Wang D; Liu Y; Zhang Y
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2018; 11(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 28841558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. A novel vibrotactile system for stimulating the glabrous skin of awake freely behaving rats during operant conditioning.
    Devecioğlu İ; Güçlü B
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Mar; 242():41-51. PubMed ID: 25593046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. An evaluation of touchscreen versus keyboard/mouse interaction for large screen process control displays.
    Noah B; Li J; Rothrock L
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Oct; 64():1-13. PubMed ID: 28610809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Sensitivity evaluation of the visual, tactile, and auditory detection response task method while driving.
    Stojmenova K; Jakus G; Sodnik J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(4):431-436. PubMed ID: 27588336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Training Improves Vibrotactile Spatial Acuity and Intensity Discrimination on the Lower Back Using Coin Motors.
    Stronks HC; Walker J; Parker DJ; Barnes N
    Artif Organs; 2017 Nov; 41(11):1059-1070. PubMed ID: 28569046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Suggestions on the applicability of visual instructions with see-through head mounted displays depending on the task.
    Nakanishi M; Taguchi K; Okada Y
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Dec; 42(1):146-55. PubMed ID: 20621286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Tactile cues in continuous operations: a preliminary study.
    Kelley AM; Grandizio CM; Estrada A; Crowley JS
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2014 Feb; 85(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 24597162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Optimization of a pneumatic balloon tactile display for robot-assisted surgery based on human perception.
    King CH; Culjat MO; Franco ML; Bisley JW; Dutson E; Grundfest WS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Nov; 55(11):2593-600. PubMed ID: 18990629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Presentation of Various Tactile Sensations Using Micro-Needle Electrotactile Display.
    Tezuka M; Kitamura N; Tanaka K; Miki N
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148410. PubMed ID: 26845336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Evaluations of physiological monitoring displays: a systematic review.
    Görges M; Staggers N
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2008 Feb; 22(1):45-66. PubMed ID: 18064532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Visual Performance With Small Concave and Convex Displays.
    Mustonen T; Kimmel J; Hakala J; Häkkinen J
    Hum Factors; 2015 Sep; 57(6):1029-50. PubMed ID: 25850112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Conveying trunk orientation information through a wearable tactile interface.
    Etzi R; Gallace A; Massetti G; D'Agostino M; Cinquetti V; Ferrise F; Bordegoni M
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Oct; 88():103176. PubMed ID: 32678783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.
    Scott JJ; Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. A Non-Touchscreen Tactile Wearable Interface as an Alternative to Touchscreen-Based Wearable Devices.
    Yoon H; Park SH
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Feb; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 32111082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Application of fuzzy functions for visual presentation of medical data.
    Krol M; Reich DL; Pavone L; Fuhrman A
    J Med Syst; 2004 Dec; 28(6):603-6. PubMed ID: 15615288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Tactile feedback display with spatial and temporal resolutions.
    Vishniakou S; Lewis BW; Niu X; Kargar A; Sun K; Kalajian M; Park N; Yang M; Jing Y; Brochu P; Sun Z; Li C; Nguyen T; Pei Q; Wang D
    Sci Rep; 2013; 3():2521. PubMed ID: 23982053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.