These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19360734)

  • 1. Dynamic causal modeling for EEG and MEG.
    Kiebel SJ; Garrido MI; Moran R; Chen CC; Friston KJ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Jun; 30(6):1866-76. PubMed ID: 19360734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamical causal modelling for M/EEG: spatial and temporal symmetry constraints.
    Fastenrath M; Friston KJ; Kiebel SJ
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(1):154-63. PubMed ID: 18718870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG.
    David O; Kiebel SJ; Harrison LM; Mattout J; Kilner JM; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 30(4):1255-72. PubMed ID: 16473023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic causal modelling of distributed electromagnetic responses.
    Daunizeau J; Kiebel SJ; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2009 Aug; 47(2):590-601. PubMed ID: 19398015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A mesostate-space model for EEG and MEG.
    Daunizeau J; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2007 Oct; 38(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 17761440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Critical comments on dynamic causal modelling.
    Lohmann G; Erfurth K; Müller K; Turner R
    Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2322-9. PubMed ID: 22001162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EEG and MEG data analysis in SPM8.
    Litvak V; Mattout J; Kiebel S; Phillips C; Henson R; Kilner J; Barnes G; Oostenveld R; Daunizeau J; Flandin G; Penny W; Friston K
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2011; 2011():852961. PubMed ID: 21437221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Empirical Bayes evaluation of fused EEG-MEG source reconstruction: Application to auditory mismatch evoked responses.
    Lecaignard F; Bertrand O; Caclin A; Mattout J
    Neuroimage; 2021 Feb; 226():117468. PubMed ID: 33075561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic causal modelling of evoked potentials: a reproducibility study.
    Garrido MI; Kilner JM; Kiebel SJ; Stephan KE; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(3):571-80. PubMed ID: 17478106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic causal modelling: a critical review of the biophysical and statistical foundations.
    Daunizeau J; David O; Stephan KE
    Neuroimage; 2011 Sep; 58(2):312-22. PubMed ID: 19961941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data.
    Gramfort A; Luessi M; Larson E; Engemann DA; Strohmeier D; Brodbeck C; Parkkonen L; Hämäläinen MS
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():446-60. PubMed ID: 24161808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coupled oscillators for modeling and analysis of EEG/MEG oscillations.
    Leistritz L; Putsche P; Schwab K; Hesse W; Süsse T; Haueisen J; Witte H
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Feb; 52(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 17313340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A unified Bayesian framework for MEG/EEG source imaging.
    Wipf D; Nagarajan S
    Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(3):947-66. PubMed ID: 18602278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian Algorithm Based Localization of EEG Recorded Electromagnetic Brain Activity.
    Jatoi MA; Kamel N; Musavi SHA; López JD
    Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2019; 15(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 31975664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neurocomputational Underpinnings of Expected Surprise.
    Lecaignard F; Bertrand O; Caclin A; Mattout J
    J Neurosci; 2022 Jan; 42(3):474-486. PubMed ID: 34819342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatiotemporal forward solution of the EEG and MEG using network modeling.
    Jirsa VK; Jantzen KJ; Fuchs A; Kelso JA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 May; 21(5):493-504. PubMed ID: 12071620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of two integration methods for dynamic causal modeling of electrophysiological data.
    Lemaréchal JD; George N; David O
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():623-631. PubMed ID: 29462723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing dynamic causal models of neurovascular coupling with fMRI and EEG/MEG.
    Jafarian A; Litvak V; Cagnan H; Friston KJ; Zeidman P
    Neuroimage; 2020 Aug; 216():116734. PubMed ID: 32179105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian fusion and multimodal DCM for EEG and fMRI.
    Wei H; Jafarian A; Zeidman P; Litvak V; Razi A; Hu D; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2020 May; 211():116595. PubMed ID: 32027965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.