BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

684 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19361728)

  • 1. Glenoid fossa position in Class III malocclusion associated with mandibular protrusion.
    Innocenti C; Giuntini V; Defraia E; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 19361728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Glenoid fossa position in different facial types: a cephalometric study.
    Baccetti T; Antonini A; Franchi L; Tonti M; Tollaro I
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Feb; 24(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 9088604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial pattern of Syrian children with Class III malocclusion.
    Mouakeh M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jun; 119(6):640-9. PubMed ID: 11395709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Longitudinal observation of mandibular motion pattern in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion subsequent to orthognathic surgery.
    Wen-Ching Ko E; Huang CS; Lo LJ; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):e158-68. PubMed ID: 22260918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Semilongitudinal cephalometric study of craniofacial growth in untreated Class III malocclusion.
    Alexander AE; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):700.e1-14; discussion 700-1. PubMed ID: 19524825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of positional relationship between the disk and condyle in asymptomatic young adult mandibular prognathism.
    Gökalp H
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Oct; 73(5):550-5. PubMed ID: 14580023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Glenoid fossa position in Class II malocclusion associated with mandibular retrusion.
    Giuntini V; De Toffol L; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):808-12. PubMed ID: 18298205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of treatments with the Forsus fatigue resistant device in relation to skeletal maturity: a cephalometric and magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Aras A; Ada E; Saracoğlu H; Gezer NS; Aras I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):616-25. PubMed ID: 22051481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dento-skeletal components of class III malocclusions for children with normal and protruded mandibles.
    Hashim HA; Sarhan OA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1993; 18(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 8110606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical column morphology in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and mandibular overjet.
    Sonnesen L; Kjaer I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):427.e7-12. PubMed ID: 17920492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Jaw forms in the post-treatment and post-retention of pseudo-Class III mandibular protrusion in the permanent dentition as compared with those of true Class III mandibular protrusion].
    Yamada W
    Nichidai Koko Kagaku; 1985 Dec; 11(4):284-302. PubMed ID: 3869274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Glenoid fossa position in surgically repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate patients.
    Sundareswaran S; Nipun CA
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Aug; 37(4):386-90. PubMed ID: 25351572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
    LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stress distribution in the temporomandibular joint after mandibular protraction: a 3-dimensional finite element method study. Part 1.
    Gupta A; Kohli VS; Hazarey PV; Kharbanda OP; Gunjal A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):737-48. PubMed ID: 19524833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes of mandibular movement tracings after the correction of mandibular protrusion by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Wang D; Fu H; Zeng R; Yang X
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2238-44. PubMed ID: 19761919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between the masticatory muscles and mandibular skeleton in mandibular prognathism with and without asymmetry.
    Kwon TG; Lee KH; Park HS; Ryoo HM; Kim HJ; Lee SH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Aug; 65(8):1538-43. PubMed ID: 17656280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of the condylar position of the temporomandibular joint by computerized tomography in Class III malocclusions: a preliminary study.
    Seren E; Akan H; Toller MO; Akyar S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 May; 105(5):483-8. PubMed ID: 8166098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simplified stress analysis on the temporomandibular joint in Class III patients with and without mandibular asymmetry using a rigid body spring model.
    Ueki K; Takeuchi N; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Nov; 12(4):312-8. PubMed ID: 19840284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anatomical relationships and superior reinforcement of the TMJ mandibular fossa.
    Wish-Baratz S; Arensburg B; Alter Z
    J Craniomandib Disord; 1992; 6(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 1401134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporomandibular joint adaptations following two-phase therapy: an MRI study.
    Wadhawan N; Kumar S; Kharbanda OP; Duggal R; Sharma R
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 Nov; 11(4):235-50. PubMed ID: 18950321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.