These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1936220)
21. Air Force women's access to abortion services and the erosion of 10 U.S.C., section 1093. Wilde ML William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(3):351-412. PubMed ID: 15977327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. A taxing tale: unconstitutional conditions and abortion subsidy. Russell MS Health Matrix Clevel; 1993; 3(2):459-94. PubMed ID: 10133325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. My body, my consent: securing the constitutional right to abortion funding. McDonagh EL Albany Law Rev; 1999; 62(3):1057-1118. PubMed ID: 10558501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The argument that never ends. Simon R US News World Rep; 2003 Jan; 134(2):24. PubMed ID: 12561696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Inverting the viability test for abortion law. Ching B Womens Rights Law Report; 2000; 22(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 16281341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Regulations prohibiting abortion counseling held unconstitutional. Rymer TA J Miss State Med Assoc; 1990 Jan; 31(1):22, 29. PubMed ID: 2304078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights. Reilly EA Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Casey and its impact on abortion regulation. Moses MF Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 16700123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Editor caught in cross fire over women's rights. Nowak EJ J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1991 Sep; 199(6):678. PubMed ID: 1955350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. In Roe's shadow. Rosenberg D Newsweek; 2003 Jan; 141(4):58-9. PubMed ID: 12608137 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court. Conclusion: the future of abortion as a "private choice". Grant ER Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):233-43. PubMed ID: 2603867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Abortion and its viability standard: the woman's diminishing right to choose. Swyers MH Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1997; 8(1-2):87-109. PubMed ID: 14628785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A woman decides: Justice O'Connor and due process rights of choice. Davis PC; Gilligan C McGeorge Law Rev; 2001; 32(3):895-914. PubMed ID: 16493803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart. Borgmann CE Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Pro-choice: a new militancy. Davis SE Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(6):32-3. PubMed ID: 2606658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Econometric analyses of U.S. abortion policy: a critical review. Klick J Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):751-82. PubMed ID: 16700120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The women of Roe v. Wade. Glendon MA Hum Life Rev; 2003; 29(3):31-8. PubMed ID: 14964200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. A case for working women. Gayle A Robinson J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1991 Jul; 199(1):12. PubMed ID: 1797767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]