95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19362864)
1. The importance of tumor palpability and transrectal ultrasonographic appearance in the contemporary clinical staging of prostate cancer.
Eisenberg ML; Cowan JE; Davies BJ; Carroll PR; Shinohara K
Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 19362864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Diagnosis of localized prostate cancer: screening and preoperative staging].
Hammerer P; Huland H
Urologe A; 1991 Nov; 30(6):378-86. PubMed ID: 1722921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is a digital rectal examination necessary in the diagnosis and clinical staging of early prostate cancer?
Philip J; Dutta Roy S; Ballal M; Foster CS; Javlé P
BJU Int; 2005 May; 95(7):969-71. PubMed ID: 15839915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PCA3 score before radical prostatectomy predicts extracapsular extension and tumor volume.
Whitman EJ; Groskopf J; Ali A; Chen Y; Blase A; Furusato B; Petrovics G; Ibrahim M; Elsamanoudi S; Cullen J; Sesterhenn IA; Brassell S; Rittenhouse H; Srivastava S; McLeod DG
J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1975-8; discussion 1978-9. PubMed ID: 18801539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is preoperative transrectal ultrasonography of value in localised prostatic carcinoma? A blind comparative study between preoperative transrectal ultrasonography and the histopathological radical prostatectomy specimen.
Vijverberg PL; Giessen MC; Kurth KH; Dabhoiwala NF; de Reijke TM; van den Tweel JG
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1992 Oct; 18(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 1426295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Reliability of endorectal echography of the prostate in the screening and staging of prostatic cancer].
Corbusier A; Vanden Bossche M; Mendes Leal A; Simon J; Wespes E; Van Regemorter G; Schulman CC
Acta Urol Belg; 1989; 57(4):831-41. PubMed ID: 2483601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate volume measured preoperatively predicts for organ-confined disease in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
Bianco FJ; Mallah KN; Korets R; Hricak H; Scardino PT; Kattan MW
Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):343-6. PubMed ID: 17320675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transrectal ultrasonography of the prostate and prostate cancer--an update.
Huben RP; Murphy GP
Appl Pathol; 1985; 3(4):198-205. PubMed ID: 3916055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of digital rectal examination and biopsy results with the radical prostatectomy specimen.
Obek C; Louis P; Civantos F; Soloway MS
J Urol; 1999 Feb; 161(2):494-8; discussion 498-9. PubMed ID: 9915434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The treatment of locally advanced (T3) prostatic carcinoma using radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy. A review].
van den Ouden D; Schröder FH
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr; 1998 Apr; 29(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 9615377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for high-grade prostate cancer.
Wambi CO; Siddiqui SA; Krane LS; Agarwal PK; Stricker HJ; Peabody JO
BJU Int; 2010 Dec; 106(11):1739-45. PubMed ID: 20575980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of clinical unilateral T3a prostate cancer - by digital rectal examination or transrectal ultrasonography?
Hsu CY; Joniau S; Oyen R; Roskams T; Van Poppel H
BJU Int; 2006 Nov; 98(5):982-5. PubMed ID: 16945120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for detection of rectal wall invasion by prostate cancer.
Leibovici D; Kamat AM; Do KA; Pettaway CA; Ng CS; Evans RB; Rodriguez-Bigas M; Skibber J; Wang X; Pisters LL
Prostate; 2005 Jan; 62(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 15389800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital rectal examination is no longer necessary in the routine follow-up of men with undetectable prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy: the implications for follow-up.
Chaplin BJ; Wildhagen MF; Schroder FH; Kirkels WJ; Bangma CH
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):906-10. PubMed ID: 16126322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved accuracy for predicting the Gleason score of prostate cancer by increasing the number of transrectal biopsy cores.
Miyake H; Kurahashi T; Takenaka A; Hara I; Fujisawa M
Urol Int; 2007; 79(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 18025846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictive modeling for the presence of prostate carcinoma using clinical, laboratory, and ultrasound parameters in patients with prostate-specific antigen levels < or = 10 ng/ml.
Stephan C; Jung K; Cammann H
Cancer; 2004 May; 100(9):1989-90; author reply 1989-90. PubMed ID: 15112283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Is a single focus of low-grade prostate cancer diagnosed on saturation biopsy predictive of clinically insignificant cancer?
Pepe P; Fraggetta F; Galia A; Candiano G; Grasso G; Aragona F
Urol Int; 2010; 84(4):440-4. PubMed ID: 20234121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Finasteride improves the sensitivity of digital rectal examination for prostate cancer detection.
Thompson IM; Tangen CM; Goodman PJ; Lucia MS; Parnes HL; Lippman SM; Coltman CA
J Urol; 2007 May; 177(5):1749-52. PubMed ID: 17437804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of digital rectal examination as a predictor of prostate cancer diagnosis among United States Veterans referred for prostate biopsy.
Issa MM; Zasada W; Ward K; Hall JA; Petros JA; Ritenour CW; Goodman M; Kleinbaum D; Mandel J; Marshall FF
Cancer Detect Prev; 2006; 30(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 16844319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
