These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19363168)

  • 1. Configural and featural processing during face perception: a new stimulus set.
    Van Belle G; De Smet M; De Graef P; Van Gool L; Verfaillie K
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):279-83. PubMed ID: 19363168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception.
    Rossion B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):274-89. PubMed ID: 18396260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Face processing in humans and new world monkeys: the influence of experiential and ecological factors.
    Neiworth JJ; Hassett JM; Sylvester CJ
    Anim Cogn; 2007 Apr; 10(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 16909230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual separability of featural and configural information in congenital prosopagnosia.
    Kimchi R; Behrmann M; Avidan G; Amishav R
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2012; 29(5-6):447-63. PubMed ID: 23428081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Featural and configural face processing strategies: evidence from a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Lobmaier JS; Klaver P; Loenneker T; Martin E; Mast FW
    Neuroreport; 2008 Feb; 19(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 18303568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
    Keyes H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Featural versus configural face processing in a rare genetic disorder: Williams syndrome.
    Isaac L; Lincoln A
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2011 Nov; 55(11):1034-42. PubMed ID: 21554469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of inversion on the encoding of normal and "thatcherized" faces.
    Boutsen L; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):955-75. PubMed ID: 12881166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two routes to face perception: evidence from psychophysics and computational modeling.
    Schwaninger A; Lobmaier JS; Wallraven C; Collishaw S
    Cogn Sci; 2009 Nov; 33(8):1413-40. PubMed ID: 21585511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence of a shift from featural to configural face processing in infancy.
    Schwarzer G; Zauner N; Jovanovic B
    Dev Sci; 2007 Jul; 10(4):452-63. PubMed ID: 17552935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Configural processing of other-race faces is delayed but not decreased.
    Wiese H; Stahl J; Schweinberger SR
    Biol Psychol; 2009 May; 81(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 19428974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Isolating the special component of face recognition: peripheral identification and a Mooney face.
    McKone E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jan; 30(1):181-97. PubMed ID: 14736306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial-frequency thresholds for configural and featural discriminations in upright and inverted faces.
    Watier NN; Collin CA; Boutet I
    Perception; 2010; 39(4):502-13. PubMed ID: 20514998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The discriminability of local cues determines the strength of holistic face processing.
    Goffaux V
    Vision Res; 2012 Jul; 64():17-22. PubMed ID: 22613193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A normative set of 98 pairs of nonsensical pictures (droodles).
    Nishimoto T; Ueda T; Miyawaki K; Une Y; Takahashi M
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Aug; 42(3):685-91. PubMed ID: 20805590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Configural and analytical processing of familiar and unfamiliar objects.
    Noudoost B; Adibi M; Moeeny A; Esteky H
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):436-41. PubMed ID: 16099356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inferring intentions from biological motion: a stimulus set of point-light communicative interactions.
    Manera V; Schouten B; Becchio C; Bara BG; Verfaillie K
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Feb; 42(1):168-78. PubMed ID: 20160297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face.
    Tanaka JW; Kaiser MD; Hagen S; Pierce LJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1000-14. PubMed ID: 24477773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity of 4-year-olds to featural and second-order relational changes in face distinctiveness.
    McKone E; Boyer BL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Jun; 94(2):134-62. PubMed ID: 16483596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Configural processing and face viewpoint.
    McKone E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):310-27. PubMed ID: 18377173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.