446 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19363458)
1. The deformity-flexibility quotient predicts both patient satisfaction and surgeon preference in the treatment of Lenke 1B or 1C curves for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Newton PO; Upasani VV; Bastrom TP; Marks MC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):1032-9. PubMed ID: 19363458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors involved in the decision to perform a selective versus nonselective fusion of Lenke 1B and 1C (King-Moe II) curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Newton PO; Faro FD; Lenke LG; Betz RR; Clements DH; Lowe TG; Haher TR; Merola AA; D'Andrea LP; Marks M; Wenger DR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S217-23. PubMed ID: 14560195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adding thoracic fusion levels in Lenke 5 curves: risks and benefits.
Lark RK; Yaszay B; Bastrom TP; Newton PO;
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jan; 38(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 22691919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Results of selective thoracic versus nonselective fusion in Lenke type 3 curves.
Singla A; Bennett JT; Sponseller PD; Pahys JM; Marks MC; Lonner BS; Newton PO; Miyanji F; Betz RR; Cahill PJ; Samdani AF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Nov; 39(24):2034-41. PubMed ID: 25271497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Lenke classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how it organizes curve patterns as a template to perform selective fusions of the spine.
Lenke LG; Edwards CC; Bridwell KH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S199-207. PubMed ID: 14560193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal radiographical criteria after selective thoracic fusion for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with a C lumbar modifier: does adherence to current guidelines predict success?
Schulz J; Asghar J; Bastrom T; Shufflebarger H; Newton PO; Sturm P; Betz RR; Samdani AF; Yaszay B;
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Nov; 39(23):E1368-73. PubMed ID: 25188601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Thoracic scoliosis fusion in adolescent and adult idiopathic scoliosis using posterior translational corrective techniques (Isola): is maximum correction of the thoracic curve detrimental to the unfused lumbar curve?
Goshi K; Boachie-Adjei O; Moore C; Nishiyama M
Spine J; 2004; 4(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 15016398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Selective versus nonselective thoracic fusion in Lenke 1C curves: a meta-analysis of baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes.
Boniello AJ; Hasan S; Yang S; Jalai CM; Worley N; Passias PG
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Dec; 23(6):721-30. PubMed ID: 26315956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lumbar curve is stable after selective thoracic fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 20-year follow-up.
Larson AN; Fletcher ND; Daniel C; Richards BS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May; 37(10):833-9. PubMed ID: 21971127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selective versus nonselective fusion for idiopathic scoliosis: does lumbosacral takeoff angle change?
Abel MF; Herndon SK; Sauer LD; Novicoff WM; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI;
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(14):1103-12. PubMed ID: 21245788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selective thoracic surgery in the Lenke type 1A: King III and King IV type curves.
Parisini P; Di Silvestre M; Lolli F; Bakaloudis G
Eur Spine J; 2009 Jun; 18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):82-8. PubMed ID: 19399532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fixed lumbar apical vertebral rotation predicts spinal decompensation in Lenke type 3C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after selective posterior thoracic correction and fusion.
Behensky H; Cole AA; Freeman BJ; Grevitt MP; Mehdian HS; Webb JK
Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1570-8. PubMed ID: 17520294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective radiographic and clinical outcomes of dual-rod instrumented anterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison with single-rod constructs.
Hurford RK; Lenke LG; Lee SS; Cheng I; Sides B; Bridwell KH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(20):2322-8. PubMed ID: 16985460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fusions ending at the thoracolumbar junction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of lower instrumented vertebrae.
Segal DN; Grabel ZJ; Konopka JA; Boissonneault AR; Yoon E; Bastrom TP; Flynn JM; ; Fletcher ND
Spine Deform; 2020 Apr; 8(2):205-211. PubMed ID: 32026437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Broader curve criteria for selective thoracic fusion.
Chang KW; Leng X; Zhao W; Chen YY; Chen TC; Chang KI
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Sep; 36(20):1658-64. PubMed ID: 21358573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can a bone marrow-based graft replacement result in similar fusion rates as rib autograft in anterior interbody fusion procedures for adolescent thoracolumbar scoliosis?
Shah SA; Borkhuu B; Littleton AG; Keller MS; Kuester V; Dodge GR
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Feb; 23(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 20084031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: should 100% correction be the goal?
Imrie M; Yaszay B; Bastrom TP; Wenger DR; Newton PO
J Pediatr Orthop; 2011; 31(1 Suppl):S9-13. PubMed ID: 21173626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Selective thoracic fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with C modifier lumbar curves: 2- to 16-year radiographic and clinical results.
Edwards CC; Lenke LG; Peelle M; Sides B; Rinella A; Bridwell KH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Mar; 29(5):536-46. PubMed ID: 15129068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of unfused segments in coronal balance reconstitution after posterior selective thoracolumbar/lumbar fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Sun Z; Qiu G; Zhao Y; Guo S; Wang Y; Zhang J; Shen J; Zhao H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Nov; 39(24):2042-8. PubMed ID: 25202933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is there a need for anterior release for 70-90 degrees masculine thoracic curves in adolescent scoliosis?
Arlet V; Jiang L; Ouellet J
Eur Spine J; 2004 Dec; 13(8):740-5. PubMed ID: 15614518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
