These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19363815)

  • 1. Actual innocence: is death different?
    Acker JR
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):297-311. PubMed ID: 19363815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alford pleas in the age of innocence.
    Redlich AD; Ozdoğru AA
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):467-88. PubMed ID: 19405036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Revisiting the Decision of Death in Hurst v. Florida.
    Cooke BK; Ginory A; Zedalis J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2016 Dec; 44(4):483-490. PubMed ID: 28003393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When domestic goes capital: Juror decision making in capital murder trials involving domestic homicide.
    Richards TN; Smith MD; Fogel SJ; Bjerregaard B
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Aug; 39(4):402-15. PubMed ID: 25844513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
    Peterfy A
    J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In the public interest: intellectual disability, the Supreme Court, and the death penalty.
    Abeles N
    Am Psychol; 2010 Nov; 65(8):743-8. PubMed ID: 21058775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Death penalty support for special offender populations of legally convicted murderers: juveniles, the mentally retarded, and the mentally incompetent.
    Boots DP; Heide KM; Cochran JK
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(2):223-38. PubMed ID: 15048861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The guilty mind and criminal sentencing: integrating legal and empirical inquiry as illustrated by capital sentencing.
    Schopp RF; Patry MW
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(5):631-51. PubMed ID: 14502693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DEATH, BUT IS IT MURDER? THE ROLE OF STEREOTYPES AND CULTURAL PERCEPTIONS IN THE WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS OF WOMEN.
    Lewis AL; Sommervold SL
    Albany Law Rev; 2015; 78(3):1035-58. PubMed ID: 26245002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suggestive eyewitness identification procedures and the Supreme Court's reliability test in light of eyewitness science: 30 years later.
    Wells GL; Quinlivan DS
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 18302010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the psychology of confessions: does innocence put innocents at risk?
    Kassin SM
    Am Psychol; 2005 Apr; 60(3):215-28. PubMed ID: 15796676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Missouri overrules the United States Supreme Court on capital punishment for minors.
    Herbert PB; Meyers JR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(4):443-6. PubMed ID: 15704630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hall v. Florida: Capital Punishment, IQ, and Persons With Intellectual Disabilities.
    Cooke BK; Delalot D; Werner TL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Jun; 43(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 26071514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Death of an unborn child: jurisprudential inconsistencies in wrongful death, criminal homicide, and abortion cases.
    Klasing MS
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 1995; 22(3):933-79. PubMed ID: 11660413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychiatry and the death penalty: the landmark Supreme Court cases and their ethical implications for the profession.
    Kermani EJ; Kantor JE
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 8193393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The psychology of defendant plea decision making.
    Redlich AD; Bibas S; Edkins VA; Madon S
    Am Psychol; 2017; 72(4):339-352. PubMed ID: 28481581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hypnosis with a criminal defendant and a crime witness: two recent related cases.
    Perry C; Laurence JR
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Oct; 38(4):266-82. PubMed ID: 2258244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The supreme court and the sentencing of juveniles in the United States: reaffirming the distinctiveness of youth.
    Siegel DM
    Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am; 2011 Jul; 20(3):431-45. PubMed ID: 21683911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wrongful Convictions and Erroneous Acquittals: Applying Packer's Model to Examine Public Perceptions of Judicial Errors in Australia.
    Williamson H; Sato M; Dioso-Villa R
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2023 Jun; 67(8):783-802. PubMed ID: 34963353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. US Supreme Court should prevent execution of murderer who no longer remembers his crime.
    Nature; 2018 Oct; 562(7725):7-8. PubMed ID: 30283113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.