These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1936417)

  • 1. Evaluation of a new type of high sharpness film for skull radiography.
    Honda E; Yoshino N; Chiba R; Sasaki T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 May; 20(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 1936417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rare earth screens for panoramic radiography.
    Hurlburt CE; Coggins LJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Apr; 57(4):451-4. PubMed ID: 6584845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-speed, single-screen/single-emulsion film systems: basic imaging properties and preliminary clinical applications.
    Higashida Y; Frank PH; Doi K
    Radiology; 1983 Nov; 149(2):571-7. PubMed ID: 6622705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Faster screen/film combinations for cephalometric radiography.
    Hurlburt CE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1981 Dec; 52(6):661-5. PubMed ID: 6947192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Kodak T-Mat G film in rotational panoramic radiography.
    Ponce AZ; McDavid WD; Lundeen RC; Morris CR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):649-52. PubMed ID: 3459998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of screen/film combinations for cephalometric radiography.
    McNicol A; Stirrups DR
    Br J Orthod; 1985 Jul; 12(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 3860251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative means of dose reduction in dental radiography.
    Rohlin M; White SC
    Curr Opin Dent; 1992 Jun; 2():1-9. PubMed ID: 1520917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative evaluation of rare-earth screen-film systems. System speed, contrast, sensitometry, RMS noise, square-wave response function, and contrast-dose-detail analysis.
    Fearon T; Vucich J; Hoe J; McSweeney WJ; Potter BM
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Aug; 21(8):654-62. PubMed ID: 3744739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic quality versus patient exposure with five panoramic screen-film combinations.
    D'Ambrosio JA; Schiff TG; McDavid WD; Langland OE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Apr; 61(4):409-11. PubMed ID: 3458153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Image quality and patient dose for different screen-film combinations.
    Guibelalde E; Fernández JM; Vañó E; Llorca A; Ruiz MJ
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Feb; 67(794):166-73. PubMed ID: 8130979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of several rare-earth film-screen systems.
    Braun M; Wilson BC
    Radiology; 1982 Sep; 144(4):915-9. PubMed ID: 7111746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exposure factors and screen-film combinations in temporomandibular joint radiography.
    Thorburn DN; Stockdill DA; Kenyon RP; Cowan I; Ferguson MM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 May; 20(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 1936423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of an asymmetric screen-film system for chest radiography.
    Morishita J; MacMahon H; Doi K; Carlin M; Sukenobu Y
    Med Phys; 1994 Nov; 21(11):1769-75. PubMed ID: 7891639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A study of dose reduction using digital luminescence radiography for lateral skull radiography.
    Seifert H; Kubale R; Hagen T; Kramann B; Leetz HK
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Apr; 69(820):311-7. PubMed ID: 8665130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of rare earth intensifying screens in cephalometric radiography.
    Stathopoulos V; Poulton DR
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 2180348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a new ultraviolet-emitting rare-earth film-screen combination.
    Farajollahi AR; Sutton D
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Jun; 70(834):629-34. PubMed ID: 9227257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative evaluation of rare earth screen-film systems. Free-response operating characteristic analysis and anatomic criteria analysis.
    Fearon T; Vucich J; McSweeney WJ; Potter BM; Brallier DR; McIlhenny J; Tepper J; Markle BM
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Sep; 21(9):734-42. PubMed ID: 3771159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Optimization of the thoracic radiograph. Experimental and clinical study on the use of various film/screen combinations using rare earths].
    Bergonzini R; Gallini R; Giugni U; Robecchi D; Amato M
    Radiol Med; 1986 May; 72(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 3715076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of two different T-grain films in rare-earth screens with a standard film-screen combination for intravenous pyelography and bone examinations.
    Logan H; Daly L; Masterson J
    Br J Radiol; 1989 Mar; 62(735):237-40. PubMed ID: 2702380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic quality of mammograms obtained with a new low-radiation-dose dual-screen and dual-emulsion film combination.
    Wojtasek DA; Teixidor HS; Govoni AF; Gareen IF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Feb; 154(2):265-70. PubMed ID: 2105011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.