These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19364244)

  • 1. Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations: a meta- analysis.
    Mickenautsch S; Yengopal V; Leal SC; Oliveira LB; Bezerra AC; Bönecker M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2009 Mar; 10(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 19364244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer cement (GIC) and resin-modified GIC restorations: a systematic review.
    Mickenautsch S; Tyas MJ; Yengopal V; Oliveira LB; Bönecker M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Sep; 18(3):139-45. PubMed ID: 21077424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eight-year study on conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth.
    Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Feb; 62(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 15124781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Atraumatic restorative treatment versus amalgam restoration longevity: a systematic review.
    Mickenautsch S; Yengopal V; Banerjee A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Jun; 14(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 19688227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
    Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical performance of glass ionomer cement and composite resin in Class II restorations in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dias AGA; Magno MB; Delbem ACB; Cunha RF; Maia LC; Pessan JP
    J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():1-13. PubMed ID: 29649506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The preventive effect of glass ionomer cement restorations on secondary caries formation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ge KX; Quock R; Chu CH; Yu OY
    Dent Mater; 2023 Dec; 39(12):e1-e17. PubMed ID: 37838608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.
    Lai GY; Zhu LK; Li MY; Wang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results.
    Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
    J Dent Res; 1997 Jul; 76(7):1387-96. PubMed ID: 9207772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do glass ionomer cements prevent caries lesions in margins of restorations in primary teeth?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Raggio DP; Tedesco TK; Calvo AF; Braga MM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2016 Mar; 147(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 26581769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
    Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three restorative materials and topical fluoride gel used in xerostomic patients: a clinical comparison.
    Haveman CW; Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Carlson K
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Feb; 134(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 12636121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Class II amalgam restorations, glass-ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: a 3-year clinical study.
    Svanberg M
    Caries Res; 1992; 26(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 1423449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A study of primary teeth restored by intracoronal restorations in children participating in an undergraduate teaching programme at Cork University Dental School and Hospital, Ireland.
    Hurley E; Da Mata C; Stewart C; Kinirons M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 25793959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results.
    Qvist V; Manscher E; Teglers PT
    J Dent; 2004 May; 32(4):285-94. PubMed ID: 15053911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Failure rate of high-viscosity GIC based ART compared with that of conventional amalgam restorations--evidence from an update of a systematic review.
    Mickenautsch S; Yengopal V
    SADJ; 2012 Aug; 67(7):329-31. PubMed ID: 23951787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches.
    Mandari GJ; Frencken JE; van't Hof MA
    Caries Res; 2003; 37(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 12771499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lack of effect of fluoride releasing resin modified glass ionomer restorations on the contacting surface of adjacent primary molars. a clinical prospective study.
    Kotsanos N; Dionysopoulos P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2004 Sep; 5(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 15471520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.