BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

687 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19365313)

  • 1. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Biere SS; Cuesta MA; van der Peet DL
    Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 19365313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature.
    Verhage RJ; Hazebroek EJ; Boone J; Van Hillegersberg R
    Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 19365314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence to support the use of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Dantoc M; Cox MR; Eslick GD
    Arch Surg; 2012 Aug; 147(8):768-76. PubMed ID: 22911078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.
    Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy in the Netherlands.
    Seesing MFJ; Gisbertz SS; Goense L; van Hillegersberg R; Kroon HM; Lagarde SM; Ruurda JP; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Wijnhoven BPL
    Ann Surg; 2017 Nov; 266(5):839-846. PubMed ID: 28796016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis.
    Nagpal K; Ahmed K; Vats A; Yakoub D; James D; Ashrafian H; Darzi A; Moorthy K; Athanasiou T
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Jul; 24(7):1621-9. PubMed ID: 20108155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer.
    Kubo N; Ohira M; Yamashita Y; Sakurai K; Toyokawa T; Tanaka H; Muguruma K; Shibutani M; Yamazoe S; Kimura K; Nagahara H; Amano R; Ohtani H; Yashiro M; Maeda K; Hirakawa K
    Anticancer Res; 2014 May; 34(5):2399-404. PubMed ID: 24778050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is there any benefit to incorporating a laparoscopic procedure into minimally invasive esophagectomy? The impact on perioperative results in patients with esophageal cancer.
    Lee JM; Cheng JW; Lin MT; Huang PM; Chen JS; Lee YC
    World J Surg; 2011 Apr; 35(4):790-7. PubMed ID: 21327605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus the conventional minimally invasive one: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Jin D; Yao L; Yu J; Liu R; Guo T; Yang K; Gou Y
    Int J Med Robot; 2019 Jun; 15(3):e1988. PubMed ID: 30737881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Totally minimally invasive esophagectomy versus hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    van Workum F; Klarenbeek BR; Baranov N; Rovers MM; Rosman C
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Aug; 33(8):. PubMed ID: 32350519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study.
    Mamidanna R; Bottle A; Aylin P; Faiz O; Hanna GB
    Ann Surg; 2012 Feb; 255(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 22173202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer.
    Decker G; Coosemans W; De Leyn P; Decaluwé H; Nafteux P; Van Raemdonck D; Lerut T
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):13-20; discussion 20-1. PubMed ID: 18952454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position: a systematic review.
    Koyanagi K; Ozawa S; Tachimori Y
    Surg Today; 2016 Mar; 46(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 25860592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer.
    Santillan AA; Farma JM; Meredith KL; Shah NR; Kelley ST
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2008 Oct; 6(9):879-84. PubMed ID: 18926097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).
    Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophageal Resection: Three-year Follow-up of the Previously Reported Randomized Controlled Trial: the TIME Trial.
    Straatman J; van der Wielen N; Cuesta MA; Daams F; Roig Garcia J; Bonavina L; Rosman C; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; van der Peet DL
    Ann Surg; 2017 Aug; 266(2):232-236. PubMed ID: 28187044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. McKeown or Ivor Lewis totally minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    van Workum F; Berkelmans GH; Klarenbeek BR; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Luyer MDP; Rosman C
    J Thorac Dis; 2017 Jul; 9(Suppl 8):S826-S833. PubMed ID: 28815080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
    Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intrathoracic versus Cervical ANastomosis after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: study protocol of the ICAN randomized controlled trial.
    van Workum F; Bouwense SA; Luyer MD; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; van der Peet DL; Daams F; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJ; Polat F; Gisbertz SS; Henegouwen MI; Heisterkamp J; Langenhoff BS; Martijnse IS; Grutters JP; Klarenbeek BR; Rovers MM; Rosman C
    Trials; 2016 Oct; 17(1):505. PubMed ID: 27756419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Comparison of Early Surgical Outcomes From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.
    Sihag S; Kosinski AS; Gaissert HA; Wright CD; Schipper PH
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Apr; 101(4):1281-8; discussion 1288-9. PubMed ID: 26704412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.