These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19365642)

  • 21. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Analysis of the status of informed consent in medical research involving human subjects in public hospitals in Shanghai.
    Jianping W; Li L; Xue D; Tang Z; Jia X; Wu R; Xi Y; Wang T; Zhou P
    J Med Ethics; 2010 Jul; 36(7):415-9. PubMed ID: 20605996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Forming and implementing community advisory boards in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.
    Zhao Y; Fitzpatrick T; Wan B; Day S; Mathews A; Tucker JD
    BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Oct; 20(1):73. PubMed ID: 31623624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Where should we draw the line between quality of care and other ethical concerns related to medical registries and biobanks?
    Hansson M
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2012 Aug; 33(4):313-23. PubMed ID: 22810581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Research Ethics Committees' Oversight of Biomedical Research in South Africa: A Thematic Analysis of Ethical Issues Raised During Ethics Review of Non-Expedited Protocols.
    Silaigwana B; Wassenaar D
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Apr; 14(2):107-116. PubMed ID: 30678521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Spine Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (Spine SCOAP): a surgeon-led approach to quality and safety.
    Lee MJ; Shonnard N; Farrokhi F; Martz D; Chapman J; Baker R; Hsiang J; Lee C; Gholish R; Flum D;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Mar; 40(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 25901980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The structure and functioning of ethical review committees.
    Gutteridge F; Bankowski Z; Curran W; Dunne J
    Soc Sci Med; 1982; 16(20):1791-800. PubMed ID: 7178924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The contribution of RCTs to quality management and their feasibility in practice.
    Brox JI
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Aug; 18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):279-93. PubMed ID: 19408018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Are research subjects adequately protected? A review and discussion of studies conducted by the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments.
    Kass NE; Sugarman J
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1996 Sep; 6(3):271-82. PubMed ID: 11653398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation.
    Goldstein CE; Weijer C; Brehaut JC; Fergusson DA; Grimshaw JM; Horn AR; Taljaard M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Feb; 19(1):14. PubMed ID: 29482537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The practice of obtaining approval from medical research ethics committees: a comparison within 12 European countries for a descriptive study on acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer's dementia.
    Rikkert MG; Lauque S; Frölich L; Vellas B; Dekkers W
    Eur J Neurol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 15693811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ethical aspects of participation in the database of genotypes and phenotypes of the National Center for Biotechnology Information: the Cancer and Leukemia Group B Experience.
    Peppercorn J; Shapira I; Deshields T; Kroetz D; Friedman P; Spears P; Collyar DE; Shulman LN; Dressler L; Bertagnolli MM
    Cancer; 2012 Oct; 118(20):5060-8. PubMed ID: 22415847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Informed consent and ethics committee approval in laboratory medicine.
    Borovecki A; Mlinaric A; Horvat M; Supak Smolcic V
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2018 Oct; 28(3):030201. PubMed ID: 30429665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cluster-randomized trials: A closer look.
    McRae AD; Taljaard M; Weijer C
    Clin Trials; 2016 Jun; 13(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 26931364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Special informed consent requirements are included in protocol review procedures.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical registries: the urgent need to address ethical hurdles.
    Evans SM; Loff B; Cameron PA
    Med J Aust; 2013 Feb; 198(3):134-5. PubMed ID: 23418684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Informed consent in emergency care research: An oxymoron?
    Furyk JS; Lawton LD; Ting JY; McD Taylor D
    Emerg Med Australas; 2017 Feb; 29(1):110-112. PubMed ID: 27469986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. What is the quality of the reporting of research ethics in publications of nursing home research?
    Karlawish JH; Hougham GW; Stocking CB; Sachs GA
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1999 Jan; 47(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 9920233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Medical ethics in Britain.
    Gillon R
    Theor Med; 1988 Oct; 9(3):251-69. PubMed ID: 3238622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.