These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Comparison of quantitative dynamic susceptibility-contrast MRI perfusion estimates obtained using different contrast-agent administration schemes at 3T. Wirestam R; Thilmann O; Knutsson L; Björkman-Burtscher IM; Larsson EM; Ståhlberg F Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e86-91. PubMed ID: 19720489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single-channel blind estimation of arterial input function and tissue impulse response in DCE-MRI. Taxt T; Jirík R; Rygh CB; Grüner R; Bartos M; Andersen E; Curry FR; Reed RK IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Apr; 59(4):1012-21. PubMed ID: 22217906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rapid measurement of arterial input function in mouse tail from projection phases. Moroz J; Wong CL; Yung AC; Kozlowski P; Reinsberg SA Magn Reson Med; 2014 Jan; 71(1):238-45. PubMed ID: 23413008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. T1 measurement of flowing blood and arterial input function determination for quantitative 3D T1-weighted DCE-MRI. Cheng HL J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 May; 25(5):1073-8. PubMed ID: 17410576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A parametric model of the brain vascular system for estimation of the arterial input function (AIF) at the tissue level. Nejad-Davarani SP; Bagher-Ebadian H; Ewing JR; Noll DC; Mikkelsen T; Chopp M; Jiang Q NMR Biomed; 2017 May; 30(5):. PubMed ID: 28211963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Absolute quantification of regional renal blood flow in swine by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a blood pool contrast agent. Lüdemann L; Nafz B; Elsner F; Grosse-Siestrup C; Meissler M; Kaufels N; Rehbein H; Persson PB; Michaely HJ; Lengsfeld P; Voth M; Gutberlet M Invest Radiol; 2009 Mar; 44(3):125-34. PubMed ID: 19151609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of blood inflow and B(1)-field inhomogeneity on measurement of the arterial input function in axial 3D spoiled gradient echo dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Roberts C; Little R; Watson Y; Zhao S; Buckley DL; Parker GJ Magn Reson Med; 2011 Jan; 65(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 20928889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Partial volume effects on arterial input functions: shape and amplitude distortions and their correction. van Osch MJ; van der Grond J; Bakker CJ J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Dec; 22(6):704-9. PubMed ID: 16261570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Defining a local arterial input function for perfusion MRI using independent component analysis. Calamante F; Mørup M; Hansen LK Magn Reson Med; 2004 Oct; 52(4):789-97. PubMed ID: 15389944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study. Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurements of tissue T1 spin-lattice relaxation time and discrimination of large draining veins using transient EPI data sets in BOLD-weighted fMRI acquisitions. Mazaheri Y; Biswal BB; Ward BD; Hyde JS Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):603-15. PubMed ID: 16713305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of partial-volume effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance perfusion imaging. Chen JJ; Smith MR; Frayne R J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Sep; 22(3):390-9. PubMed ID: 16104009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of signal formation in local arterial input function measurements of dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Bleeker EJ; Webb AG; van Walderveen MA; van Buchem MA; van Osch MJ Magn Reson Med; 2012 May; 67(5):1324-31. PubMed ID: 22190258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Partial volume effect (PVE) on the arterial input function (AIF) in T1-weighted perfusion imaging and limitations of the multiplicative rescaling approach. Hansen AE; Pedersen H; Rostrup E; Larsson HB Magn Reson Med; 2009 Oct; 62(4):1055-9. PubMed ID: 19672948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Arterial input function measurements for bolus tracking perfusion imaging in the brain. Kellner E; Mader I; Mix M; Splitthoff DN; Reisert M; Foerster K; Nguyen-Thanh T; Gall P; Kiselev VG Magn Reson Med; 2013 Mar; 69(3):771-80. PubMed ID: 22610991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correcting saturation effects of the arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI: a Monte Carlo simulation. Brunecker P; Villringer A; Schultze J; Nolte CH; Jungehülsing GJ; Endres M; Steinbrink J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 25(9):1300-11. PubMed ID: 17462846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]