These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19365968)

  • 1. Using poisson regression to compare rates of unsatisfactory pap smears among gynecologists and to evaluate a performance improvement plan.
    Wachtel MS; Hatley WG; de Riese C
    Acta Cytol; 2009; 53(2):160-4. PubMed ID: 19365968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving cervical cytology screening in a remote, high risk population.
    Shield PW; Nolan GR; Phillips GE; Cummings MC
    Med J Aust; 1999 Mar; 170(6):255-8. PubMed ID: 10212646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The adequacy of Papanicolaou smears as performed by family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists.
    Fiscella K; Franks P
    J Fam Pract; 1999 Apr; 48(4):294-8. PubMed ID: 10229255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inadequate screening in patients evaluated by nongynecologists for cervical cancer: a case control analysis.
    Cole ME; Milam MR; Scott TA; Jones HW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 May; 198(5):e48-50. PubMed ID: 18342826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reprocessing unsatisfactory ThinPrep Papanicolaou test specimens increases sample adequacy and detection of significant cervicovaginal lesions.
    Islam S; West AM; Saboorian MH; Ashfaq R
    Cancer; 2004 Apr; 102(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 15098249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ThinPrep Pap Test. Accuracy for glandular disease.
    Ashfaq R; Gibbons D; Vela C; Saboorian MH; Iliya F
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 9987455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of monolayered cervical smears in a gynecology outpatient setting in Kuwait.
    Luthra UK; Chishti M; Dey P; Jolly SV; Abdulla M; Das DK; Sugathan TN; Ajrawi MT; George J; George SS; Aziz AA; al-Juwaiser A; Karim FA; Mallik MK; Sheikh ZA; Khan S
    Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(2):303-10. PubMed ID: 11917577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Presence of endocervical cells and number of slides in cervicovaginal smears: differences in performance between gynecologists.
    Celasun B
    Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(5):730-4. PubMed ID: 11575651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Not all unsatisfactory ThinPrep cervical Pap tests are unsatisfactory: Reprocessing improves the satisfactory and detection rates of ThinPrep cervical cytology.
    AbdullGaffar B; Kamal MO
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 Sep; 38(9):699-701. PubMed ID: 19950397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The unsatisfactory ThinPrep® Pap Test™: analysis of technical aspects, most common causes, and recommendations for improvement.
    Rosa M; Pragasam P; Saremian J; Aoalin A; Graf W; Mohammadi A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Jul; 41(7):588-94. PubMed ID: 22833404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality assessment and improvement of "Unsatisfactory" liquid-based cervicovaginal papanicolaou smears.
    Mirzamani N; Chau K; Rafael O; Shergill U; Sajjan S; Sumskaya I; Gimenez C; Klein M; Das K
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2017 Oct; 45(10):873-877. PubMed ID: 28752611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of a liquid-based, thin-layer Pap test in a community hospital. Impact on cytology performance and productivity.
    Sass MA
    Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 14969176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists releases new guidelines for Papanicolaou (Pap) tests.
    Sperling R
    Home Healthc Nurse; 2004 Mar; 22(3):163. PubMed ID: 15017317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Liquid-based cytology for primary cervical cancer screening: a multi-centre study.
    Monsonego J; Autillo-Touati A; Bergeron C; Dachez R; Liaras J; Saurel J; Zerat L; Chatelain P; Mottot C
    Br J Cancer; 2001 Feb; 84(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 11161401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal collection technique and devices for a quality pap smear.
    Marchand L; Mundt M; Klein G; Agarwal SC
    WMJ; 2005 Aug; 104(6):51-5. PubMed ID: 16218317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adoption of liquid-based cervical cancer screening tests by family physicians and gynecologists.
    Rappaport KM; Forrest CB; Holtzman NA
    Health Serv Res; 2004 Aug; 39(4 Pt 1):927-47. PubMed ID: 15230935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The gynecologist's perspective of liability and quality issues with the Papanicolaou smear.
    Greer BE
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):246-9. PubMed ID: 9111109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology.
    Wang TY; Chen HS; Yang YC; Tsou MC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Jul; 98(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 10463000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An Australian trial of ThinPrep: a new cytopreparatory technique.
    Laverty CR; Thurloe JK; Redman NL; Farnsworth A
    Cytopathology; 1995 Jun; 6(3):140-8. PubMed ID: 7669924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Causes and relevance of unsatisfactory and satisfactory but limited smears of liquid-based compared with conventional cervical cytology.
    Siebers AG; Klinkhamer PJ; Vedder JE; Arbyn M; Bulten J
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Jan; 136(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 22208490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.