BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

470 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19366288)

  • 1. Salience representation in the parietal and frontal cortex.
    Zenon A; Filali N; Duhamel JR; Olivier E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 May; 22(5):918-30. PubMed ID: 19366288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anterior intraparietal sulcus is sensitive to bottom-up attention driven by stimulus salience.
    Geng JJ; Mangun GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1584-601. PubMed ID: 18752405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. fMRI-guided TMS on cortical eye fields: the frontal but not intraparietal eye fields regulate the coupling between visuospatial attention and eye movements.
    Van Ettinger-Veenstra HM; Huijbers W; Gutteling TP; Vink M; Kenemans JL; Neggers SF
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Dec; 102(6):3469-80. PubMed ID: 19812293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sources of top-down control in visual search.
    Weidner R; Krummenacher J; Reimann B; Müller HJ; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 21(11):2100-13. PubMed ID: 19199412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hemispheric asymmetry in the remapping and maintenance of visual saliency maps: a TMS study.
    van Koningsbruggen MG; Gabay S; Sapir A; Henik A; Rafal RD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Aug; 22(8):1730-8. PubMed ID: 19803692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal dynamics of parietal cortex involvement in visual search.
    Rosenthal CR; Walsh V; Mannan SK; Anderson EJ; Hawken MB; Kennard C
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(5):731-43. PubMed ID: 16150470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field: effects on visual perception and attention.
    Grosbras MH; Paus T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):1109-20. PubMed ID: 12419133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left human frontal eye fields eliminates the cost of invalid endogenous cues.
    Smith DT; Jackson SR; Rorden C
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(9):1288-96. PubMed ID: 15949513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Brain structures involved in visual search in the presence and absence of color singletons.
    Talsma D; Coe B; Munoz DP; Theeuwes J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Apr; 22(4):761-74. PubMed ID: 19309291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field.
    Schwartz S; Vuilleumier P; Hutton C; Maravita A; Dolan RJ; Driver J
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Jun; 15(6):770-86. PubMed ID: 15459076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frontal eye field stimulation modulates the balance of salience between target and distractors.
    Walker R; Techawachirakul P; Haggard P
    Brain Res; 2009 May; 1270():54-63. PubMed ID: 19285965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. TMS over the intraparietal sulcus induces perceptual fading.
    Kanai R; Muggleton NG; Walsh V
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Dec; 100(6):3343-50. PubMed ID: 18922944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of the angular gyrus in visual conjunction search investigated using signal detection analysis and transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Muggleton NG; Cowey A; Walsh V
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(8):2198-202. PubMed ID: 18394659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Greater frontal-parietal synchrony at low gamma-band frequencies for inefficient than efficient visual search in human EEG.
    Phillips S; Takeda Y
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):350-4. PubMed ID: 19481120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attention mechanisms in visual search -- an fMRI study.
    Leonards U; Sunaert S; Van Hecke P; Orban GA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2000; 12 Suppl 2():61-75. PubMed ID: 11506648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. TMS pulses on the frontal eye fields break coupling between visuospatial attention and eye movements.
    Neggers SF; Huijbers W; Vrijlandt CM; Vlaskamp BN; Schutter DJ; Kenemans JL
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Nov; 98(5):2765-78. PubMed ID: 17699696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative analysis of attention and detection signals during visual search.
    Shulman GL; McAvoy MP; Cowan MC; Astafiev SV; Tansy AP; d'Avossa G; Corbetta M
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Nov; 90(5):3384-97. PubMed ID: 12917383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual feature and conjunction searches of equal difficulty engage only partially overlapping frontoparietal networks.
    Donner TH; Kettermann A; Diesch E; Ostendorf F; Villringer A; Brandt SA
    Neuroimage; 2002 Jan; 15(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 11771970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus-response incompatibility activates cortex proximate to three eye fields.
    Merriam EP; Colby CL; Thulborn KR; Luna B; Olson CR; Sweeney JA
    Neuroimage; 2001 May; 13(5):794-800. PubMed ID: 11304076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Task-irrelevant stimulus salience affects visual search.
    Lamy D; Zoaris L
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1472-80. PubMed ID: 19289140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.