These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19366641)

  • 1. An image based auto-focusing algorithm for digital fundus photography.
    Moscaritolo M; Jampel H; Knezevich F; Zeimer R
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Nov; 28(11):1703-7. PubMed ID: 19366641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A computer algorithm to quantitatively assess quality of digital optic disc images.
    Moscaritolo M; Jampel H; Zimmer-Galler I; Knezevich F; Zeimer R
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2010; 41(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 20307051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oral fluorescein angiography with the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope.
    Garcia CR; Rivero ME; Bartsch DU; Ishiko S; Takamiya A; Fukui K; Hirokawa H; Clark T; Yoshida A; Freeman WR
    Ophthalmology; 1999 Jun; 106(6):1114-8. PubMed ID: 10366079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Image quality characteristics of a novel colour scanning digital ophthalmoscope (SDO) compared with fundus photography.
    Strauss RW; Krieglstein TR; Priglinger SG; Reis W; Ulbig MW; Kampik A; Neubauer AS
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Nov; 27(6):611-8. PubMed ID: 17956367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
    Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital ocular fundus imaging: a review.
    Bernardes R; Serranho P; Lobo C
    Ophthalmologica; 2011; 226(4):161-81. PubMed ID: 21952522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease.
    Murgatroyd H; Ellingford A; Cox A; Binnie M; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Leese GP
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variance owing to observer, repeat imaging, and fundus camera type on cup-to-disc ratio estimates by stereo planimetry.
    Kwon YH; Adix M; Zimmerman MB; Piette S; Greenlee EC; Alward WL; Abràmoff MD
    J Glaucoma; 2009; 18(4):305-10. PubMed ID: 19365196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semi-automated retinal vessel analysis in nonmydriatic fundus photography.
    Schuster AK; Fischer JE; Vossmerbaeumer U
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 92(1):e42-9. PubMed ID: 23879386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-assisted image processing for a simulated stereo effect of ocular fundus and fluorescein angiography photographs.
    Chen LJ; Yeh SI
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2010; 41(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 20507012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital fundus imaging of subretinal neovascularization.
    Rapkin JS; Rapkin KM
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1992 Jun; 24(6):230-5. PubMed ID: 1444084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-assisted, interactive fundus image processing for macular drusen quantitation.
    Shin DS; Javornik NB; Berger JW
    Ophthalmology; 1999 Jun; 106(6):1119-25. PubMed ID: 10366080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective evaluation of digital non-stereo color fundus photography as a screening tool in age-related macular degeneration.
    Pirbhai A; Sheidow T; Hooper P
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Mar; 139(3):455-61. PubMed ID: 15767053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a portable fundus camera for use in the teleophthalmologic diagnosis of glaucoma.
    Yogesan K; Constable IJ; Barry CJ; Eikelboom RH; Morgan W; Tay-Kearney ML; Jitskaia L
    J Glaucoma; 1999 Oct; 8(5):297-301. PubMed ID: 10529928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diabetic retinopathy screening using digital non-mydriatic fundus photography and automated image analysis.
    Hansen AB; Hartvig NV; Jensen MS; Borch-Johnsen K; Lund-Andersen H; Larsen M
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):666-72. PubMed ID: 15606461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening.
    Ruamviboonsuk P; Teerasuwanajak K; Tiensuwan M; Yuttitham K;
    Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):826-32. PubMed ID: 16650679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated quality evaluation of digital fundus photographs.
    Bartling H; Wanger P; Martin L
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Sep; 87(6):643-7. PubMed ID: 19719806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging versus dilated ophthalmic examination for nondiabetic eye disease in persons with diabetes.
    Chow SP; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Katalinic P; Hock K; Tolson A; Kirby R; Bursell SE; Aiello LP
    Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):833-40. PubMed ID: 16650680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital fundus imaging: a comparison with photographic techniques.
    Rapkin JS; Rapkin KM; Wilson GW
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1991 Feb; 23(2):46-53. PubMed ID: 2029112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of autofluorescence imaging with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope and the fundus camera in age-related geographic atrophy.
    Schmitz-Valckenberg S; Fleckenstein M; Göbel AP; Sehmi K; Fitzke FW; Holz FG; Tufail A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Aug; 146(2):183-92. PubMed ID: 18514607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.