184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19367089)
1. Engaging the public on biobanks: outcomes of the BC biobank deliberation.
O'Doherty KC; Burgess MM
Public Health Genomics; 2009; 12(4):203-15. PubMed ID: 19367089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation.
O'Doherty KC; Hawkins AK; Burgess MM
Soc Sci Med; 2012 Nov; 75(9):1604-11. PubMed ID: 22867865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recruiting for representation in public deliberation on the ethics of biobanks.
Longstaff H; Burgess MM
Public Underst Sci; 2010 Mar; 19(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 20533799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Informed consent in biobank research: a deliberative approach to the debate.
Secko DM; Preto N; Niemeyer S; Burgess MM
Soc Sci Med; 2009 Feb; 68(4):781-9. PubMed ID: 19095337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biobanking, public consultation, and the discursive logics of deliberation: five lessons from British Columbia.
Walmsley H
Public Underst Sci; 2010 Jul; 19(4):452-68. PubMed ID: 20977183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stock options, tax credits or employment contracts please! The value of deliberative public disagreement about human tissue donation.
Walmsley HL
Soc Sci Med; 2011 Jul; 73(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 21683492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biobanking in British Columbia: discussions of the future of personalized medicine through deliberative public engagement.
Burgess M; O'Doherty K; Secko D
Per Med; 2008 May; 5(3):285-296. PubMed ID: 29783499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Managing the introduction of biobanks to potential participants: lessons from a deliberative public forum.
O'Doherty K; Ibrahim T; Hawkins A; Burgess M; Watson P
Biopreserv Biobank; 2012 Feb; 10(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 24849749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biobanks and the Moral Concerns of Donors: A Democratic Deliberation.
De Vries RG; Ryan KA; Gordon L; Krenz CD; Tomlinson T; Jewell S; Kim SYH
Qual Health Res; 2019 Nov; 29(13):1942-1953. PubMed ID: 30095038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An Australian approach to the policy translation of deliberated citizen perspectives on biobanking.
Molster C; Maxwell S; Youngs L; Potts A; Kyne G; Hope F; Dawkins H; O'Leary P
Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 22179074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evolutionary concepts in biobanking - the BC BioLibrary.
Watson PH; Wilson-McManus JE; Barnes RO; Giesz SC; Png A; Hegele RG; Brinkman JN; Mackenzie IR; Huntsman DG; Junker A; Gilks B; Skarsgard E; Burgess M; Aparicio S; McManus BM
J Transl Med; 2009 Nov; 7():95. PubMed ID: 19909513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trade-offs, fairness, and funding for cancer drugs: key findings from a deliberative public engagement event in British Columbia, Canada.
Bentley C; Costa S; Burgess MM; Regier D; McTaggart-Cowan H; Peacock SJ
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 May; 18(1):339. PubMed ID: 29739463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. From consent to institutions: designing adaptive governance for genomic biobanks.
O'Doherty KC; Burgess MM; Edwards K; Gallagher RP; Hawkins AK; Kaye J; McCaffrey V; Winickoff DE
Soc Sci Med; 2011 Aug; 73(3):367-74. PubMed ID: 21726926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial.
Carman KL; Mallery C; Maurer M; Wang G; Garfinkel S; Yang M; Gilmore D; Windham A; Ginsburg M; Sofaer S; Gold M; Pathak-Sen E; Davies T; Siegel J; Mangrum R; Fernandez J; Richmond J; Fishkin J; Siu Chao A
Soc Sci Med; 2015 May; 133():11-20. PubMed ID: 25828260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the quality of deliberative stakeholder consultations involving allied health professionals in pediatric palliative care and hematology/oncology in Canada.
Rahimzadeh V; Longo C; Gagnon J; Fernandez C; Bartlett G
BMC Palliat Care; 2021 Dec; 20(1):189. PubMed ID: 34906102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: a case study of public deliberation on the ethics of surrogate consent for research.
De Vries R; Stanczyk A; Wall IF; Uhlmann R; Damschroder LJ; Kim SY
Soc Sci Med; 2010 Jun; 70(12):1896-1903. PubMed ID: 20378225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding public reactions to commercialization of biobanks and use of biobank resources.
Nicol D; Critchley C; McWhirter R; Whitton T
Soc Sci Med; 2016 Aug; 162():79-87. PubMed ID: 27343817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In the public interest: assessing expert and stakeholder influence in public deliberation about biobanks.
MacLean S; Burgess MM
Public Underst Sci; 2010 Jul; 19(4):486-96. PubMed ID: 20977185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Structuring public engagement for effective input in policy development on human tissue biobanking.
O'Doherty KC; Hawkins A
Public Health Genomics; 2010; 13(4):197-206. PubMed ID: 20395688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing Facilitator Fidelity to Principles of Public Deliberation: Tutorial.
Draucker C; Carrión A; Ott MA; Knopf A
JMIR Form Res; 2023 Dec; 7():e51202. PubMed ID: 38090788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
