3537 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19369085)
1. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes?
Alsoufi B; Manlhiot C; McCrindle BW; Canver CC; Sallehuddin A; Al-Oufi S; Joufan M; Al-Halees Z
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 36(1):84-90; discussion 90. PubMed ID: 19369085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: time-related outcomes and risk factors.
Alsoufi B; Al-Halees Z; Fadel B; Al-Wesabi A; Al-Ahmadi M; Joufan M; Siblini G; Canver CC
J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 May; 19(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 20583397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes and associated risk factors for mitral valve replacement in children.
Alsoufi B; Manlhiot C; Al-Ahmadi M; McCrindle BW; Kalloghlian A; Siblini G; Bulbul Z; Al-Halees Z
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Sep; 40(3):543-51. PubMed ID: 21353791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term outcomes of valve replacement with modern prostheses in young adults.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Bédard P; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Mar; 27(3):425-33; discussion 433. PubMed ID: 15740951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Eighteen-year follow up after Hancock II bioprosthesis insertion.
Legarra JJ; Llorens R; Catalan M; Segura I; Trenor AM; de Buruaga JS; Rabago G; Sarralde A
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10096477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses.
Fann JI; Miller DC; Moore KA; Mitchell RS; Oyer PE; Stinson EB; Robbins RC; Reitz BA; Shumway NE
Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov; 62(5):1301-11; discussion 1311-2. PubMed ID: 8893561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 10-year results.
Murakami T; Eishi K; Nakano S; Kobayashi J; Sasako Y; Isobe F; Kosakai Y; Kito Y; Kawashima Y
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8834725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experience with low-dose aspirin as thromboprophylaxis for the Tissuemed porcine aortic bioprosthesis: a survey of five years' experience.
Goldsmith I; Lip GY; Mukundan S; Rosin MD
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):574-9. PubMed ID: 9793859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes and associated risk factors for aortic valve replacement in 160 children: a competing-risks analysis.
Karamlou T; Jang K; Williams WG; Caldarone CA; Van Arsdell G; Coles JG; McCrindle BW
Circulation; 2005 Nov; 112(22):3462-9. PubMed ID: 16316968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mitral valve replacement with the Quattro stentless pericardial bioprosthesis: mid-term clinical and echocardiographic follow up.
Alsoufi B; Al-Shahid M; Manlhiot C; Al-Amri M; McCrindle BW; Fadel B; Al-Halees Z
J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 May; 19(3):304-11. PubMed ID: 20583392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén PS
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Twenty-year results of the Hancock II bioprosthesis.
Borger MA; Ivanov J; Armstrong S; Christie-Hrybinsky D; Feindel CM; David TE
J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jan; 15(1):49-55; discussion 55-6. PubMed ID: 16480012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term follow up of patients undergoing reoperative surgery with aortic or mitral valve replacement using a St. Jude Medical prosthesis.
Emery RW; Krogh CC; McAdams S; Emery AM; Holter AR
J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 Jul; 19(4):473-84. PubMed ID: 20845896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gender differences in the long-term outcomes after valve replacement surgery.
Kulik A; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Goldstein W; Bédard P; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Heart; 2009 Feb; 95(4):318-26. PubMed ID: 18653574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Up to nine-years' experience with the Allcarbon prosthetic heart valve.
Ho TH; Van Nguyen P; Phan PK; Pham VN
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):512-7. PubMed ID: 16116878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fifteen-year results with the Hancock II valve: a multicenter experience.
Rizzoli G; Mirone S; Ius P; Polesel E; Bottio T; Salvador L; Zussa C; Gerosa G; Valfrè C
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Sep; 132(3):602-9, 609.e1-4. PubMed ID: 16935116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evolution of mitral valve replacement in children: a 40-year experience.
Brown JW; Fiore AC; Ruzmetov M; Eltayeb O; Rodefeld MD; Turrentine MW
Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 Feb; 93(2):626-33; discussion 633. PubMed ID: 22153051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The homograft aortic valve: a 29-year, 99.3% follow up of 1,022 valve replacements.
O'Brien MF; Harrocks S; Stafford EG; Gardner MA; Pohlner PG; Tesar PJ; Stephens F
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):334-44; discussion 335. PubMed ID: 11380096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
