515 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19369118)
21. Risk factors for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after open pyeloplasty in a large pediatric cohort.
Braga LH; Lorenzo AJ; Bägli DJ; Keays M; Farhat WA; Khoury AE; Salle JL
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1684-7; discussion 1687-8. PubMed ID: 18708226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Outcome analysis and cost comparison between externalized pyeloureteral and standard stents in 470 consecutive open pyeloplasties.
Braga LH; Lorenzo AJ; Farhat WA; Bägli DJ; Khoury AE; Pippi Salle JL
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1693-8; discussion1698-9. PubMed ID: 18708220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children younger than 2 years.
Cascio S; Tien A; Chee W; Tan HL
J Urol; 2007 Jan; 177(1):335-8. PubMed ID: 17162086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Feasibility and safety of retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site dismembered pyeloplasty: a clinical report of 10 cases.
Chen Z; Chen X; Wu ZH; Luo YC; He Y; Li NN; Xie CQ; Lai C
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2012 Sep; 22(7):685-90. PubMed ID: 22845552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
Abdel-Karim AM; Fahmy A; Moussa A; Rashad H; Elbadry M; Badawy H; Hammady A
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):401.e1-401.e6. PubMed ID: 27614698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Desai MM; Desai MR; Gill IS
Urology; 2004 Jul; 64(1):16-21; discussion 21. PubMed ID: 15245924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: comparison with a cohort of open surgery.
Lee RS; Retik AB; Borer JG; Peters CA
J Urol; 2006 Feb; 175(2):683-7; discussion 687. PubMed ID: 16407025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned.
Kutikov A; Nguyen M; Guzzo T; Canter D; Casale P
J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2237-9; discussion 2239-40. PubMed ID: 17070302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. McMaster experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Hussain A; Whelan P; Piercey K; Kapoor A
Can J Urol; 2004 Jun; 11(3):2299-302. PubMed ID: 15287998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty.
Rassweiler JJ; Subotic S; Feist-Schwenk M; Sugiono M; Schulze M; Teber D; Frede T
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1000-5. PubMed ID: 17296396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children: preliminary report of a prospective randomized trial.
Penn HA; Gatti JM; Hoestje SM; DeMarco RT; Snyder CL; Murphy JP
J Urol; 2010 Aug; 184(2):690-5. PubMed ID: 20639039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Long-term follow-up for salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after failed open pyeloplasty.
Shapiro EY; Cho JS; Srinivasan A; Seideman CA; Huckabay CP; Andonian S; Lee BR; Richstone L; Kavoussi LR
Urology; 2009 Jan; 73(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 18950836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants and children: comparison with open surgery.
Piaggio LA; Franc-Guimond J; Noh PH; Wehry M; Figueroa TE; Barthold J; González R
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1579-83. PubMed ID: 17707047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children.
Yee DS; Shanberg AM; Duel BP; Rodriguez E; Eichel L; Rajpoot D
Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):599-602. PubMed ID: 16504272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Pediatric robot assisted retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty: a 5-year experience.
Olsen LH; Rawashdeh YF; Jorgensen TM
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):2137-41; discussion 2141. PubMed ID: 17870122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Janetschek G; Peschel R; Altarac S; Bartsch G
Urology; 1996 Mar; 47(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 8633393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction surgery: report of 49 cases.
Umari P; Lissiani A; Trombetta C; Belgrano E
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Dec; 83(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 22670313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Comparison of three dimensional and two dimentional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction].
Xu W; Li H; Ji Z; Zhang X; Zhang Y; Xiao H; Liu G
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 52(10):771-4. PubMed ID: 25573218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.
Uberoi J; Disick GI; Munver R
BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1722-9. PubMed ID: 19519760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Initial failure in open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction].
Wakabayashi Y; Johnin K; Kataoka A; Kim CJ; Yoshiki T; Okada Y
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2002 Aug; 48(8):475-7. PubMed ID: 12243072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
