141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19369443)
1. Comparison of the Bactec 9240 and BacT/Alert blood culture systems for evaluation of placental cord blood for transfusion in neonates.
Riedel S; Junkins A; Stamper PD; Cress G; Widness JA; Doern GV
J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Jun; 47(6):1645-9. PubMed ID: 19369443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of two resin-containing blood culture media in detection of bloodstream infections and in direct matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) broth assays for isolate identification: clinical comparison of the BacT/Alert Plus and Bactec Plus systems.
Fiori B; D'Inzeo T; Di Florio V; De Maio F; De Angelis G; Giaquinto A; Campana L; Tanzarella E; Tumbarello M; Antonelli M; Sanguinetti M; Spanu T
J Clin Microbiol; 2014 Oct; 52(10):3558-67. PubMed ID: 25031441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Performance of Three Blood Culture Systems in a Chinese Tertiary-Care Hospital.
Li G; Sun J; Pan S; Li W; Zhang S; Wang Y; Sun X; Xu H; Ming L
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2019; 9():285. PubMed ID: 31456951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comprehensive Evaluation of Compendial USP<71>, BacT/Alert Dual-T, and Bactec FX for Detection of Product Sterility Testing Contaminants.
England MR; Stock F; Gebo JET; Frank KM; Lau AF
J Clin Microbiol; 2019 Feb; 57(2):. PubMed ID: 30541938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the BACTEC 9240 and BacT/Alert blood culture systems for detection of bacterial contamination in platelet concentrates.
Riedel S; Siwek G; Beekmann SE; Richter SS; Raife T; Doern GV
J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Jun; 44(6):2262-4. PubMed ID: 16757635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Controlled clinical laboratory comparison of BACTEC plus aerobic/F resin medium with BacT/Alert aerobic FAN medium for detection of bacteremia and fungemia.
Jorgensen JH; Mirrett S; McDonald LC; Murray PR; Weinstein MP; Fune J; Trippy CW; Masterson M; Reller LB
J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Jan; 35(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 8968880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microbial screening of UC blood units by an automated culture system: effect of delayed testing on bacterial detection.
Sparrow RL
Cytotherapy; 2004; 6(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 14985164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of growth based rapid microbiological methods for sterility testing of vaccines and other biological products.
Parveen S; Kaur S; David SA; Kenney JL; McCormick WM; Gupta RK
Vaccine; 2011 Oct; 29(45):8012-23. PubMed ID: 21871516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Controlled comparison of the BacT/Alert and BACTEC 660/730 nonradiometric blood culture systems.
Wilson ML; Weinstein MP; Reimer LG; Mirrett S; Reller LB
J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Feb; 30(2):323-9. PubMed ID: 1537900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the two blood culture systems, Bactec 9240 and BacT/Alert 3D, in the detection of Candida spp. and bacteria with polymicrobial sepsis.
Klingspor L; Muhammed SA; Ozenci V
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2012 Nov; 31(11):2983-7. PubMed ID: 22669561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of the detection of anaerobic bacteria in haemoculture systems BACTEC Lytic/10 Anaerobic/F, BacT/Alert FAN Anaerobic and BacT/Alert FN Anaerobic].
Cermák P; Förstl M
Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek; 2005 Jun; 11(3):100-4. PubMed ID: 16025428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of BacT/Alert and BACTEC NR 860 blood culture systems in a laboratory not continuously staffed.
Riest G; Linde HJ; Shah PM
Clin Microbiol Infect; 1997 Jun; 3(3):345-351. PubMed ID: 11864131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13.
Menchinelli G; Liotti FM; Fiori B; De Angelis G; D'Inzeo T; Giordano L; Posteraro B; Sabbatucci M; Sanguinetti M; Spanu T
Front Microbiol; 2019; 10():221. PubMed ID: 30837964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative evaluation of BACT/ALERT FA PLUS and FN PLUS blood culture bottles and BD BACTEC Plus Aerobic and Anaerobic blood culture bottles for antimicrobial neutralization.
Chung Y; Kim IH; Han M; Kim HS; Kim HS; Song W; Kim JS
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2019 Dec; 38(12):2229-2233. PubMed ID: 31375943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of BACTEC 9240 and BacT/Alert blood culture systems in an adult hospital.
Smith JA; Bryce EA; Ngui-Yen JH; Roberts FJ
J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Jul; 33(7):1905-8. PubMed ID: 7665668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Growth and detection of aerobic bacterial pathogens in BacT/Alert FA, BacT/Alert SA, Bactec Plus Aerobic/F and Bactec Standard Aerobic/F].
Cermák P; Sedláková P; Mejstríková L; Mazurová J
Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek; 2006 Aug; 12(4):156-60. PubMed ID: 16958021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Time-to-detection of bacteria and yeast with the BACTEC FX versus BacT/Alert Virtuo blood culture systems.
Somily AM; Habib HA; Torchyan AA; Sayyed SB; Absar M; Al-Aqeel R; Binkhamis AK
Ann Saudi Med; 2018; 38(3):194-199. PubMed ID: 29848937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Growth Performance of the BacT/ALERT VIRTUO and BACTEC FX Blood Culture Systems Under Simulated Bloodstream Infection Conditions.
Park J; Han S; Shin S
Clin Lab; 2017 Jan; 63(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 28164485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of BACTEC PLUS blood culture media to BacT/Alert FA blood culture media for detection of bacterial pathogens in samples containing therapeutic levels of antibiotics.
Flayhart D; Borek AP; Wakefield T; Dick J; Carroll KC
J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Mar; 45(3):816-21. PubMed ID: 17166960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Controlled comparison of BACTEC 13A, MYCO/F LYTIC, BacT/ALERT MB, and ISOLATOR 10 systems for detection of mycobacteremia.
Crump JA; Tanner DC; Mirrett S; McKnight CM; Reller LB
J Clin Microbiol; 2003 May; 41(5):1987-90. PubMed ID: 12734238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]