BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19370480)

  • 1. Monocular patching affects inattention but not perseveration in spatial neglect.
    Khurshid S; Longin H; Crucian GP; Barrett AM
    Neurocase; 2009 Aug; 15(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 19370480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of prism adaptation on motor-intentional spatial bias in neglect.
    Fortis P; Chen P; Goedert KM; Barrett AM
    Neuroreport; 2011 Oct; 22(14):700-5. PubMed ID: 21817924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prism adaptation moves neglect-related perseveration to contralesional space.
    Nys GM; Seurinck R; Dijkerman HC
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2008 Dec; 21(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 19057176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How many forms of perseveration? Evidence from cancellation tasks in right hemisphere patients.
    Gandola M; Toraldo A; Invernizzi P; Corrado L; Sberna M; Santilli I; Bottini G; Paulesu E
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Dec; 51(14):2960-75. PubMed ID: 24200919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monocular patching may induce ipsilateral "where" spatial bias.
    Chen P; Erdahl L; Barrett AM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):711-6. PubMed ID: 19100274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterizing exploration behavior in spatial neglect: omissions and repetitive search.
    Olk B; Harvey M
    Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1118(1):106-15. PubMed ID: 16979143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Drawing perseveration in neglect: effects of target density.
    Pia L; Ricci R; Gindri P; Vallar G
    J Neuropsychol; 2013 Mar; 7(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 22646536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of prismatic adaptation on spatial gradients in unilateral neglect: A comparison of visual and auditory target detection with central attentional load.
    Eramudugolla R; Boyce A; Irvine DR; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2681-92. PubMed ID: 20478321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Complexity vs. unity in unilateral spatial neglect.
    Rode G; Fourtassi M; Pagliari C; Pisella L; Rossetti Y
    Rev Neurol (Paris); 2017; 173(7-8):440-450. PubMed ID: 28843415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monocular patching in subjects with right-hemisphere stroke affects perceptual-attentional bias.
    Barrett AM; Burkholder S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2006; 43(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 17041819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Right hemispatial ipsilesional neglect with chronic right hemisphere strokes.
    Williamson JB; Lamb DG; Burtis DB; Haque S; M Zilli E; Kesayan T; Harciarek M; Heilman KM
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2018 May; 40(4):347-356. PubMed ID: 28812421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multi-tasking uncovers right spatial neglect and extinction in chronic left-hemisphere stroke patients.
    Blini E; Romeo Z; Spironelli C; Pitteri M; Meneghello F; Bonato M; Zorzi M
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Nov; 92():147-157. PubMed ID: 26948071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contralesional cross-over in chronic neglect: visual search patterns reveal neglect of the ipsilesional hemispace.
    Gall C; Günther T; Fuhrmans F; Sabel BA
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2012; 31(2):171-84. PubMed ID: 22951712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lost in the middle. Attentional modulation of the pseudoneglect phenomenon in a "no hands" line bisection paradigm.
    Lavanchy L; Mayer E; Hauert CA
    Cortex; 2004 Feb; 40(1):181-2. PubMed ID: 15174463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motor and perceptual factors in pseudoneglect.
    MacLeod MS; Turnbull OH
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(6):707-13. PubMed ID: 10390032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of monocular viewing and eye dominance on spatial attention.
    Roth HL; Lora AN; Heilman KM
    Brain; 2002 Sep; 125(Pt 9):2023-35. PubMed ID: 12183348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ipsilesional 'where' with contralesional 'what' neglect.
    Kwon JC; Ahn S; Kim S; Heilman KM
    Neurocase; 2012; 18(5):415-23. PubMed ID: 22136591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Presence of Motor-Intentional Aiming Deficit Predicts Functional Improvement of Spatial Neglect With Prism Adaptation.
    Goedert KM; Chen P; Boston RC; Foundas AL; Barrett AM
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2014 Jun; 28(5):483-93. PubMed ID: 24376064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ipsilesional intentional neglect and the effect of cueing.
    Schwartz RL; Barrett AM; Kim M; Heilman KM
    Neurology; 1999 Dec; 53(9):2017-22. PubMed ID: 10599774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eye patching biases spatial attention after thalamic hemorrhage in a patient without spatial neglect: a case report.
    Barrett AM; Crucian GP; Heilman KM
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2004 Jun; 85(6):1017-20. PubMed ID: 15179660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.