These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19370482)

  • 21. Global-local processing and dispositional bias interact with emotion processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Kerusauskaite SG; Simione L; Raffone A; Srinivasan N
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Feb; 238(2):345-354. PubMed ID: 31925476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dual-task processing when task 1 is hard and task 2 is easy: reversed central processing order?
    Leonhard T; Fernández SR; Ulrich R; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):115-36. PubMed ID: 20718575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A psychological refractory period in access to visual short-term memory and the deployment of visual-spatial attention: multitasking processing deficits revealed by event-related potentials.
    Brisson B; Jolicoeur P
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Mar; 44(2):323-33. PubMed ID: 17343714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cross-modal psychological refractory period in vision, audition, and haptics.
    Rau PP; Zheng J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1573-1585. PubMed ID: 32052346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies.
    Miller J; Ulrich R; Rolke B
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 May; 58(3):273-310. PubMed ID: 19281972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Probing the cortical network underlying the psychological refractory period: a combined EEG-fMRI study.
    Hesselmann G; Flandin G; Dehaene S
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jun; 56(3):1608-21. PubMed ID: 21397701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Parallel response selection in dual-task situations via automatic category-to-response translation.
    Thomson SJ; Watter S; Finkelshtein A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1791-802. PubMed ID: 20952778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Parallel response selection after callosotomy.
    Hazeltine E; Weinstein A; Ivry RB
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 20(3):526-40. PubMed ID: 18004953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. On the joint effects of stimulus quality, regularity, and lexicality when reading aloud: new challenges.
    Besner D; O'Malley S; Robidoux S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):750-64. PubMed ID: 20438270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Separate and shared sources of dual-task cost in stimulus identification and response selection.
    Arnell KM; Duncan J
    Cogn Psychol; 2002 Mar; 44(2):105-47. PubMed ID: 11863322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Frequency effects in spoken and visual word recognition: evidence from dual-task methodologies.
    Cleland AA; Gaskell MG; Quinlan PT; Tamminen J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):104-19. PubMed ID: 16478330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Analysis of interference effects in simultaneous processing of 2 problems].
    Schubert T
    Z Exp Psychol; 1996; 43(4):625-56. PubMed ID: 9206587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The psychological refractory period in Parkinson's disease.
    Hsieh S
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):893-902. PubMed ID: 11153866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The cross-script length effect: further evidence challenging PDP models of reading aloud.
    Rastle K; Havelka J; Wydell TN; Coltheart M; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 19210093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Determinants of central processing order in psychological refractory period paradigms: central arrival times, detection times, or preparation?
    Leonhard T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):2012-43. PubMed ID: 21678229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How strategic is the central bottleneck: can it be overcome by trying harder?
    Ruthruff E; Johnston JC; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1368-84. PubMed ID: 19803643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Queuing network modeling of the psychological refractory period (PRP).
    Wu C; Liu Y
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Oct; 115(4):913-54. PubMed ID: 18954209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect?
    Van Selst M; Ruthruff E; Johnston JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Oct; 25(5):1268-83. PubMed ID: 10531663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Is lexical access autonomous? Evidence from combining overlapping tasks with recording event-related brain potentials.
    Rabovsky M; Alvarez CJ; Hohlfeld A; Sommer W
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1222():156-65. PubMed ID: 18585684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dual-task performance with ideomotor-compatible tasks: is the central processing bottleneck intact, bypassed, or shifted in locus?
    Lien MC; McCann RS; Ruthruff E; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):122-44. PubMed ID: 15709868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.