203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19370483)
1. Irrelevant speech effects and statistical learning.
Neath I; Guérard K; Jalbert A; Bireta TJ; Surprenant AM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1551-9. PubMed ID: 19370483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?
Larsen JD; Baddeley A
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1249-68. PubMed ID: 14578082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the irrelevance of phonological similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.
LeCompte DC; Shaibe DM
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1997 Feb; 50(1):100-18. PubMed ID: 9080790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Overlap of phonetic features as a determinant of the between-stream phonological similarity effect.
Eagan DE; Chein JM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):473-81. PubMed ID: 21928935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Irrelevant sound disrupts speech production: exploring the relationship between short-term memory and experimentally induced slips of the tongue.
Saito S; Baddeley A
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1309-40. PubMed ID: 15513248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can the irrelevant speech effect turn into a stimulus suffix effect?
Schlittmeier SJ; Hellbrück J; Klatte M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 May; 61(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 18421641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Irrelevant speech does not interfere with serial recall in early blind listeners.
Kattner F; Ellermeier W
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2207-17. PubMed ID: 24796760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Directly assessing the relationship between irrelevant speech and articulatory suppression.
Neath I; Farley LA; Surprenant AM
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1269-78; discussion 1301-6. PubMed ID: 14578083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual similarity at encoding and retrieval in an item recognition task.
Mate J; Baqués J
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1277-84. PubMed ID: 19235099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Phonological similarity and the irrelevant speech effect: implications for models of short-term verbal memory.
Larsen JD; Baddeley A; Andrade J
Memory; 2000 May; 8(3):145-57. PubMed ID: 10889899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Hebb repetition effect as a laboratory analogue of novel word learning.
Szmalec A; Duyck W; Vandierendonck A; Mata AB; Page MP
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Mar; 62(3):435-43. PubMed ID: 18785073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reification of phonological storage.
Macken WJ; Jones DM
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1279-88; discussion 1301-6. PubMed ID: 14578084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Disruption of order information by irrelevant items: a serial recognition paradigm.
Gisselgård J; Uddén J; Ingvar M; Petersson KM
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Mar; 124(3):356-69. PubMed ID: 16777043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall.
Farrell S; Lewandowsky S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):838-49. PubMed ID: 14516217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech versus non-speech as irrelevant sound: controlling acoustic variation.
Little JS; Martin FH; Thomson RH
Biol Psychol; 2010 Sep; 85(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 20553792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Synchronized brain activity during rehearsal and short-term memory disruption by irrelevant speech is affected by recall mode.
Kopp F; Schröger E; Lipka S
Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):188-203. PubMed ID: 16298003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption?
Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):243-8. PubMed ID: 18194067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Irrelevant speech effects and sequence learning.
Farley LA; Neath I; Allbritton DW; Surprenant AM
Mem Cognit; 2007 Jan; 35(1):156-65. PubMed ID: 17533889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.
Neath I
Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):403-23. PubMed ID: 11082850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deviance detection in congruent audiovisual speech: evidence for implicit integrated audiovisual memory representations.
Winkler I; Horváth J; Weisz J; Trejo LJ
Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):281-92. PubMed ID: 19733617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
